Debbie Wasserman-Schultz — a nickle-and-dime politician, cheaper than Sandra Fluke’s grand-a-month taxpayer supply of condoms, Plan B and douche bags. Among the most absurd of all intellectual dunces American politics will ever produce. Her countenance reeks of inebriation each time she breathes staring at a camera.
As the tweet earlier suggests, she truly has a fondness for the sauce. It is difficult discerning her from tipsy Teddy of Chappaquiddick, who ensured all Americans have the natural right to “a blonde in every pond”. Wasserman-Schultz, as with progressive Republican President Herbert Hoover, would pledge all will own a house with a two car garage if one votes for all Democrats a few dozen times. Yet sadly (for her), Bill Clinton beat her to the punch. We are still paying for his boner from 1994 with the “loan if you have a pulse” policy.
How many left hooks has she flailed at conservatives, ranting “racist, homophobic, Islamophobic, xenophobic, bigoted and sexist”, her words of course, slurred by drink and tipsy with calumny? This spring, she engaged in a war of words with Sen. Rand Paul over support for abortions of fully-developed infants. The reaction by feminists was another zeitgeist of summer blockbuster proportions, proving again their inimitable successes with “submission and domination rape politics”.
Sandra Fluke, once the rising star of the radical feminist movement when she as a millionaire declared she could not afford $1,000 per month for birth control, only reiterated that she, Schultz and all feminists by association willingly serve themselves as the hors d’oeuvres during every soiree.
Far be it from me to oppose Fluke fulfilling her sexual fantasy to be gang raped by Boko Haram — or I should say, as one of those “Nigerian girls” she racially-profiled. Given her rhetoric and cavalier lifestyle, she would get her wish. Not one Republican man would consume her as a party favor, fearing they might contract a yeast infection — or worse.
Like all Democrats, Fluke and Wasserman-Schultz supports human trafficking, slavery and child prostitution with her taxpayer money odometer measuring her personal tab for Plan B and IUD’s — she practically admitted it. After all, Fluke equated herself with the oppressed “Nigerian girls” in “choosing” to be gang raped. Then again the porn industry has a rape fetish genre she could profit off taking it high and hard given considers gang rape to be a laughing matter (which she likely enjoys).
Given the Democrats’ heritage with slavery and urban-planned segregation, political outsiders should never be surprised. Yet with her family links to Hollywood, I would be surprised if Fluke would not prefer co-starring in the remake of Mandingo.
Wasserman-Schultz, like every Democrat, is a not-so-closet racist, given nearly all feminists are both in activism and action. She advocates through her policies not merely slavery, but eugenics, supporting more funds for abortion clinics that target poor urban blacks and Hispanics for extermination under Jonathan Gruber’s terms. To Democrats, the black community’s offspring are merely “marginal children” to be exterminated “for the social good”.
Ironically, Nancy Pelosi said the same thing. And she is the most powerful woman in the history of U.S. politics as a former House Speaker .
“Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those – one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.”
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, herself a frequently-inebriated public figure as she slept off her consumption during this year’s State of the Union Address, concurs.
Q: If you were a lawyer again, what would you want to accomplish as a future feminist legal agenda?
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Reproductive choice has to be straightened out. There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. The states that had changed their abortion laws before Roe [to make abortion legal] are not going to change back. So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don’t know why this hasn’t been said more often.
Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.
Worst of all, Obama science czar and author of Ecoscience (1976) John Holdren, alongside Paul Ehrlich, corroborated Gruber’s mission of depopulation.
“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier than trying to sterilize men. This of course would be feasible only in countries where the majority of births are medically assisted. Unfortunately such a program therefore is not practical for most less developed countries…The development of a long term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable with official permission for a limited number of births.”
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is emblematic of all that leftists consider humanitarian through totalitarian egalitarianism. No doubt how excited she was upon the New York’s State Assembly passed live-birth abortions at the House level April 31, 2015, only for the Senate to nix it days later. The GOP Senate caved to Democrats on a bill for human trafficking while still granting its word to confirm Loretta Lynch as the new Obama Attorney General. Race rioting is funded by contemporary radical left-wing Jacobins like George Soros, Beyonce Knowles and hubby Jay-Z.
Democrats can rest assured blacks will keep business good for Planned Parenthood, while those fortunate to survive childbirth pick Obama’s cotton while residing at his plantations — around every street corner of a public housing project. While Obama hates white people, he would despise learning he behaves as the ultimate political “Simon Legree”. Obama, has as much in common with blacks as white people do polar bears.
Wasserman-Schultz asked of Sen. Paul if women’s health care matters to him. He should have answered all people matter who are human. Yet feminists reject any link to the human race, preferring instead being classified as “womyn”. “Womyn” are who Sanger should have declared to be among the disabled — “human weeds”. Real Americans never vote with their vaginas. Real Americans have souls, a conscience as their guides and measurable moral compass, an appreciation for the sanctity of life. Wasserman-Schultz is but a marginal prop for militant feminism’s push to topple a perceived “patriarchy”. Her life is worth far less than those she demands killed post-term.
More ....Here
Like it, share it, support it, and follow us on the sites below
If you haven't checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go Here and do so.
No comments:
Post a Comment