Showing posts with label Creative Minority. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Creative Minority. Show all posts

You Want the Straight Dope on Homeschooling?



Pssst. You want the truth on homeschooling?



Well, one of my favorite Catholic bloggers Rebecca Frech has a book called"Teaching in Your Tiara: A Homeschooling Book for the Rest of Us."
The book came out last week and peaked at #3 on homeschooling books on Amazon. That's kind of a big deal. And there's a reason. The book is great. But that's no surprise because she's one of the truly honest, funny, and smart Catholic bloggers out there.

Obama Pardons Turkey with Sign of the Cross

 




Father Z recently wrote a piece about blasphemy and the way in which President Obama is depicted.

And a good friend of mine just gave me a heads up about this. Did you know that Obama pardoned the turkey this Thanksgiving with a sign of the cross. It was a flippant gesture, I'm sure. But it really does rub me the wrong way because to this man - the most influential and powerful man in the world - religion is a punch line. Bitter clingers and all that stuff.

  This is a man who's attacked the Catholic Church like no other president before him. Fr. Z said "I have occasionally quipped here that during Obama’s third term, men like me will be hunted down and dealt with." I wonder if Obama will pardon Christians like he did the turkey.





Submitted by : Claire Golaszewski,



Romney Killed It

Romney Killed It



Holy smokes. I can't believe what I saw. And it was strange because as I'm watching it I'm thinking that Mitt was killing it. But then I wondered if maybe I'm just in the tank for Romney or something and I had lost any sense of reality. Romney was prepared. Like crazy prepared.

Romney outed Obama as ill prepared. So after the debate my brothers and I were all texting each other things like "He won going away, right" and "Was that even close?"

And now even the media is saying Romney won. Believe me in the next few days the media will savage Romney. Bad. But reality was so clear that they couldn't lie about it. Even James Carville said Romney won. The CBS insta-poll said Romney crushed Obama in the debate. Hilariously, the anchor essentially apologized for the small sample and said it wasn't very scientific or anything. In that poll, 46 percent said Romney won. 22 percent said Obama. That's double folks.

Frank Luntz's focus group was even more startling. I think it was like 22-3 who said Romney won. And 15 of the people in the panel had voted for Obama last time.

I loved the line from Romney about where our rights come from. He made it plain that our rights come from "Our Creator." Obama constantly drops that part.

I thought Lehrer wasn't too bad to be honest but I can't believe we didn't get to any questions about religious liberty. But Romney did give a shout-out about it.

Update: CNN poll says 67-25 percent that Romney won. Wow. I'm afraid to put on MSNBC for fear of seeing some kind of breakdown.

Update2: Oh my. I just saw this from MSNBC. Chris Matthews is absolutely losing it. Someone should take away Matthews belt and shoelaces.

 


Obama Cites Bible



Obama Cites Bible

From the party that booed God, the president is now saying he makes policy via the Bible.
CNS News
In a video posted Sept. 10 on the “Catholics for Obama” page on his campaign website, President Barack Obama says that one of the reasons he supports foreign aid is because he is answering the biblical call “to care for the least of these.”
No word yet on if Obama's read the part of the Bible that reads, "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; Before you were born I sanctified you..."

The Democrat Party In A Nutshell




The Democrat Party In A Nutshell
This video is amazing and represents the Democrat Party in a nutshell. When the political blowback from removing God and Jerusalem from the platform became to much, Obama intervened to force an amendment. When a significant or at least a significant plurality objected to a vote requiring a 2/3 majority, the chair didn't like that answer and called for another vote. When the same thing happened 2 more times, he just lied about the result. Watch this amazing video and then read my commentary below.






Unreal.

Now the Democrats know how it feels to have legislation shoved down your throat even over the expressed will of the majority. Sucks don't it?

Today, the Democrats booed God and the Jews, no wonder they were afraid of lightning.

Bottom line, Democrats don't care what you think even if you are a democrat.

After today's debacle, the Democrat Party really should remove the any allusion to democracy in their name. They should just be The Party.

Dem leaders screwed their delegates today and they didn't even need taxpayer subsidized birth control to do it

Get used to this, this is our future if they win.

The Democrats' Soft Extremism



 

Obama is out of ideas, and Clinton's speech was unworthy of him.


Peggy Noonan Nails The DNC Convention. Nails it.



She writes:
What a fabulously confident and ingenuous-seeming political narcissist Ms. Fluke is. She really does think—and her party apparently thinks—that in a spending crisis with trillions in debt and many in need, in a nation in existential doubt as to its standing and purpose, in a time when parents struggle to buy the good sneakers for the kids so they're not embarrassed at school . . . that in that nation the great issue of the day, and the appropriate focus of our concern, is making other people pay for her birth-control pills. That's not a stand, it's a non sequitur. She is not, as Rush Limbaugh oafishly, bullyingly said, a slut. She is a ninny, a narcissist and a fool. And she was one of the great faces of the party in Charlotte. That is extreme. Childish, too.




Barack Obama is deeply overexposed and often boring. He never seems to be saying what he's thinking. His speech Thursday was weirdly anticlimactic. There's too much buildup, the crowd was tired, it all felt flat. He was somber, and his message was essentially banal: We've done better than you think. Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?

There were many straw men. There were phrases like "the shadow of a shuttered steel mill," which he considers writerly. But they sound empty and practiced now, like something you've heard in a commercial or an advertising campaign.

It was stale and empty. He's out of juice.

His daughters have grown beautiful.

As for Joe Biden, I love him and will hear nothing against him. He's like Democrats the way they used to be, and by that I do not mean idiotic, I mean normal—manipulative only to a normal degree, roughly aware of the facts of normal life, alert to and even respecting of such normal things as religious faith. I wish he did not insist on referring to his wife as "Dr. Jill Biden." I'm sure she has many doctorates, but so do half the unemployed in Manhattan.

John Kerry was on fire. It was the best speech of his career. He drew blood on foreign policy: "Talk about being before it before you were against it!" Obama will take that message, on Afghanistan, into debate.
***

Was it a good convention?

Beneath the funny hats, the sweet-faced delegates, the handsome speakers and the babies waving flags there was something disquieting. All three days were marked by a kind of soft, distracted extremism. It was unshowy and unobnoxious but also unsettling.

There was the relentless emphasis on Government as Community, as the thing that gives us spirit and makes us whole. But government isn't what you love if you're American, America is what you love. Government is what you have, need and hire. Its most essential duties—especially when it is bankrupt—involve defending rights and safety, not imposing views and values. We already have values. Democrats and Republicans don't see all this the same way, and that's fine—that's what national politics is, the working out of this dispute in one direction or another every few years. But the Democrats convened in Charlotte seemed more extreme on the point, more accepting of the idea of government as the center of national life, than ever, at least to me.

The fight over including a single mention of God in the platform—that was extreme. The original removal of the single mention by the platform committee—extreme. The huge "No!" vote on restoring the mention of God, and including the administration's own stand on Jerusalem—that wasn't liberal, it was extreme. Comparing the Republicans to Nazis—extreme. The almost complete absence of a call to help education by facing down the powers that throw our least defended children under the school bus—this was extreme, not mainstream.

The sheer strangeness of all the talk about abortion, abortion, contraception, contraception. I am old enough to know a wedge issue when I see one, but I've never seen a great party build its entire public persona around one. Big speeches from the heads of Planned Parenthood and NARAL, HHS Secretary and abortion enthusiast Kathleen Sebelius and, of course, Sandra Fluke.

"Republicans shut me out of a hearing on contraception," Ms. Fluke said. But why would anyone have included a Georgetown law student who never worked her way onto the national stage until she was plucked, by the left, as a personable victim?

Convention Journal

Related News:

Obama Pledges a U.S. Revival

Capital Journal: Two Divergent Paths to Prosperity

Democrats Party on Corporations' Tab

More Opinion:

Review and Outlook: Transformers 2

Potomac Watch: The Party That Obama Un-Built

OpinionJournal @ the Convention

Peggy Noonan's Blog

What a fabulously confident and ingenuous-seeming political narcissist Ms. Fluke is. She really does think—and her party apparently thinks—that in a spending crisis with trillions in debt and many in need, in a nation in existential doubt as to its standing and purpose, in a time when parents struggle to buy the good sneakers for the kids so they're not embarrassed at school . . . that in that nation the great issue of the day, and the appropriate focus of our concern, is making other people pay for her birth-control pills. That's not a stand, it's a non sequitur. She is not, as Rush Limbaugh oafishly, bullyingly said, a slut. She is a ninny, a narcissist and a fool.

And she was one of the great faces of the party in Charlotte. That is extreme. Childish, too.

Something else, and it had to do with tone. I remember the Republicans in Tampa bashing the president, hard, but not the entire Democratic Party. In Charlotte they bashed Mitt Romney, but they bashed the Republican Party harder. If this doesn't strike you as somewhat unsettling, then you must want another four years of all war all the time between the parties. I don't think the American people want that. Because, actually, they're not extreme.
***

Bill Clinton is The Master. That is stipulated. Almost everyone in the media was over the moon about his speech. It was a shrewd and superb moment of political generosity, his hauling into town to make the case, but it was a hack speech. It was the speech of a highly gifted apparatchik. All great partisan speeches include some hard and uncomfortable truths, but Mr. Clinton offered none. He knows better than so much of what he said. In real life he makes insightful statements on the debt, the deficit and the real threat they pose. He knows more about the need for and impediments to public-school reform than half the reformers do. He knows exactly why both parties can't reach agreement in Washington, and what each has done wrong along the way. But Wednesday night he stuck to fluid fictions and clever cases. It was smaller than Bill Clinton is.

Still, he gave the president one great political gift: He put Medicaid on the table. He put it right there next to the pepper shaker and said Look at that! People talk Medicare and Social Security, but, as Mr. Clinton noted, more than half of Medicaid is spent on nursing-home care for seniors and on those with disabilities such as Down syndrome and autism. Will it be cut?

Here's what I'm seeing the past 10 years. The baby boomers have been supporting their grown children and their aged parents. They are stressed, stretched and largely uncomplaining, because they know that as boomers—shallow, selfish—they're the only generation not allowed to complain. And just as well, as complaints are the only area of national life where we have a surplus. But they are spiritually and financially holding the country together, and they're coming to terms with the fact that it's going to be that way for a good long time. They're going to take a keen interest in where Medicaid goes.

Romney-Ryan take note: this will arrive as an issue.
***

So: was it a good convention? We'll know by the polls, by the famous bounce, or lack of it. A guess? Dead-cat bounce. Just like the Republicans got.

Maybe Mr. Clinton made a bigger, more broadly positive impression than I suspect; maybe a sense the Democrats were extreme will take hold. People left both conventions talking about only one thing: the debates. They know they didn't move the needle in Tampa and Charlotte. The people in charge of politics aren't so good at politics anymore.

MORE

The Bishops Were Wrong On The Ryan Budget

  



 In the wake of the selection of Paul Ryan as the VP nominee, you will be hearing a lot about how Ryan is a bad Catholic because the Bishops criticized the Ryan budget plan.

Let me cut to the chase, the Bishops were wrong.

The text of the letter issued by the Bishops gets the basics wrong and completely ignores the immorality of continued debt. They say...
On behalf of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, I write to urge you to resist for moral and human reasons unacceptable cuts to hunger and nutrition programs. The committee has been instructed to reduce agricultural programs by an additional $33.2 billion. In allocating these reductions, the committee should protect essential programs that serve poor and hungry people over subsidies that assist large and relatively well-off agricultural enterprises. Cuts to nutrition programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) will hurt hungry children, poor families, vulnerable seniors and workers who cannot find employment. These cuts are unjustified and wrong. If cuts are necessary, the committee should first look towards reducing and targeting commodity and subsidy programs that disproportionately go to large growers and agribusiness
Except those draconian cuts they fear are not cuts at all, but reductions in growth from the projected baseline budgeting planned growth. To suggest that these are real cuts is disingenuous.

Further, this letter does not address the real problems facing America, rather the Bishops sit on their high horses while simultaneously sticking their heads in the sand.

This massive accumulating debt has real consequences, and those consequence will be disastrous for the very poor the USCCB pretends to be concerned about.

If we continue to spend the way we are, we will have a Greek-style economy sooner rather than later, and with massive unemployment and massive shrinkage of the economy, where will the poor be then?

Ryan's budget is just a modest (too modest maybe) step in the right direction to try and prevent America (and America's poor) from going over the fiscal cliff. He should be applauded by the Bishops instead of scolded.

This letter was beneath the dignity of the USCCB and was merely a product of that body's reflexive leftist tilt.

The bottom line, Ryan is right and the Bishops were wrong. ANd I am not the only one who thinks so, so do a lot of the Bishops.
“There have been some concerns raised by lay Catholics, especially some Catholic economists, about what was perceived as a partisan action against Congressman Ryan and the budget he had proposed,” Bishop Boyea said in reference to the USCCB committee’s opposition to the House budget plan. “We need to be articulate only in principles, and let the laity make these applications … It was perceived as partisan, and thus didn’t really further dialogue in our deeply divided country.”

“I’m not sure that we have the humility yet not to stray into areas where we lack competence, and where we need to let the laity take the lead,” he added. “We need to learn far more than we need to teach in this area. We need to listen more than we need to speak. We already have an excellent, fine Compendium [on the Social Doctrine of the Church].”
...
Echoing Bishop Boyea’s comments, Archbishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City said that the committee is “at times perceived as partisan” and needs to consider the principle of subsidiarity, which has been “neglected in past documents.” Archbishop Naumann added that solutions that place emphasis in enrolling people in government programs have been “tried for decades” and failed.

“We need to talk about the debt and the real seriousness of that debt,” he continued. “Sometimes we’re perceived as just encouraging the government to spend more money with no realistic way of how we’re going to afford to do this.”
Amen and amen.

MORE


Now Obamacare is a Political Issue

 

Obamacare is legal, according to the Supreme Court. Now it's up to us to make it toxic.

It's now a political issue. I think many Americans believed the court would do the right thing and toss the individual mandate so people weren't pushing Romney too hard or the GOP. Now, everything's changed. Now it's up to our politicians to get rid of it.

We have to make this Supreme Court decision the worst thing that ever happened to President Obama. We have to get fired up. That means it's up to us to vote the Dems out in such major numbers that somehow magically the GOP grows a spine and tosses the darn thing out. This issue just became paramount in this campaign and we need to make Romney stick to his word to us.

You know who gets it? Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List) President Marjorie Dannenfelser got it right away and sent out this statement ten minutes after the Supreme Court made their announcement.
“From the outset, Obamacare is fundamentally flawed legislation because it makes American taxpayers complicit in the deaths of countless unborn children,” said SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser. “Today’s decision to uphold the individual mandate to force individuals to purchase health care plans that offend their conscience is incredibly disappointing.

“Over the last four years, President Obama has revealed his loyalty to the abortion industry. At no time was this clearer than during the health care reform debate, when he fought tenaciously for the largest expansion of taxpayer funding of abortion on demand since Roe v. Wade. As the presidential race heats up, the Susan B. Anthony List will continue to remind American voters where the President’s allegiance truly lies. We will not stop fighting until every U.S. taxpayer is freed from under-writing the abortion business.”
We can take a few minutes to be in shock about this. And the Dems can enjoy their touchdown dance for a bit. Democratic Party Executive Director Patrick Gaspard tweeted "it's constitutional. Bitches."

Seriously. That's what he wrote. Class.

Now, the fight begins. Now.

Now that Obamacre has been labeled a tax by the Supreme Court, let's hang the largest tax increase in the history of America around Obama's neck.
Cont. Reading

The Big Facebook Fail







They will one day write about Facebook in textbooks. However the entry will not be in the success story chapter but rather in the chapter entitled Cautionary Tales.

The Facebook IPO is the textbook definition of irrational exuberance. Farhad Manjoo writing at Slate states that in order to just maintain its current share price, Facebook will have to increase its revenue tenfold. Tenfold, just to maintain.