Showing posts with label Submitted by : Claire gooski. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Submitted by : Claire gooski. Show all posts

2012The Converts to Catholicism





2012The Converts to Catholicism You Didn't Know About


[Update: I've published a follow-up post, More Converts You Didn't Know About]

Yes, people do choose to join the Catholic Church.

Both my wife and I joined the Catholic Church as adults (see My Faith Story). The website Why I'm Catholic has a great (and growing) collection of stories of people who joined the Church. There are so many great stories. Obviously, there's the stories of people like Paul, Augustine, Ambrose, Emperor Constantine, John Cardinal Newman, Dorothy Day, Alasdair MacIntyre, Edith Stein, and G.E.M. Anscombe, Francis Beckwith (who was president of the Evangelical Theological Society when he converted), Scott Hahn, and Richard Neuhaus.

There's also the bisexual atheist blogger who just became Catholic this last summer, the former evangelical/emergent church co-author of the book Jesus for President who found his way back to the Church via Catholic Social Teaching, the pro-life leaders Lila Rose, Abby Johnson, Bernard Nathanson, and Bryan Kemper, the Wheaton College Bible professor who crossed the Tiber a year and a half ago (just a few years after a philosophy professor there did the same thing), and the steady stream of disaffected Anglicans joining the Catholic Church. Even former speaker of the house and recent presidential candidate Newt Gingrich (who produced a great documentary on John Paul II) and former prime minister of the U.K. Tony Blair have jumped aboard.


Oscar Wilde

Below are four stories of people who joined the Catholic Church as adults who I think many people probably don't know about (at least I was surprised to learn about their stories!). One was a convicted homosexual playwright who converted on his death-bed, another was an ex-Marxist who authored the "eco-Bible", the third was a drafter of the U.N's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the last one was the founder of a whole new academic discipline.

Death-bed conversion of a homosexual playwright: Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)

A contributor to the aestheticism movement and best known for his play The Importance of Being Earnest, Wilde is also a well-known example of a famous person convicted under laws in the 19th century that punished homosexual acts. What is not as well-known, however, is that he joined the Catholic Church literally on his death-bed. Though born into an Anglican family, his interest in the Church started as a young man. A meeting with Pope Pius IX left a big impact on him, and he read the writings the Cardinal Newman, another great convert to the faith. At the age of twenty four, he actually was set join the Catholic Church, but decided against it at the last minute.

A quarter of a century later, after serving his prison sentence, he unsuccessfully tried to go on a six-month Jesuit retreat. He later developed cerebral meningitis. With his health deteriorating, a friend called for a priest. The priest conditionally baptized him (Wilde had a vague memory of being baptized as a child) and gave him Last Rites. He died the next day.


E. F. Schumacher

The liberal environmentalist nobody knew was Catholic: E. F. Schumacher (1911-1977)

Schumacher was a prot?g? of John Maynard Keynes as a young man and had an accomplished career as an economist. For much of his adult life, he was an avowed Marxist atheist. But a visit to Burma in the early 1950s and seeing how Buddhism shaped the economic life of the country got him to start rethinking his atheism. Upon returning to England, he decided to look into the Christian tradition and read the writings of St Thomas Aquinas, St Teresa of Avila, and St John of the Cross, and the lives of other saints. He also read modern Catholic thinkers Rene Guenon, Etienne Gilson, G. K. Chesterton (another convert), and Jacques Maritain (another convert, see below). A friend eventually persuaded him to read the papal social teaching encyclicals. A friend of his relates how he responded:

He replied, 'No, no, I'm sure that the Popes are very holy men living in their ivory tower in the Vatican but they don't know a thing about the conduct of practical affairs... But this friend... insisted that he should read the social encyclicals, Rerum Novarum and Quadragesimo Anno above all... He did so and was absolutely staggered. He said, 'here were these celibates living in an ivory tower... why can they talk a great deal of sense when everyone else talks nonsense'... (source)

Pope Paul VI's encyclical reaffirming the Church's stance against the use of contraception Humanae Vitae came out as he was getting closer to wanting to join the Church. Though many criticized the teaching, Schumacher was in full support: "If the Pope had written anything else, I would have lost all faith in the papacy." (source) For his wife and daughter, who had also been considering Catholicism, Humanae Vitae was the final assurance that the Catholic Church was the right place to be. After years of being intellectually convinced of Catholicism, he was eventually received into the Church.


Jacques Maritain

Two years later, he published the book Small is Beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. Touted by TIME magazine as the "eco-Bible", the best-seller simply explained in non-theological language the ideas of Catholic social teaching. When he died four years later a celebrity among liberal environmentalists, most still didn't know he was Catholic. His daughter has related that, as word got out, many were "astounded" and "thought it was a real let-down, a betrayal." (Read more about his conversion here.)

The suicidal scientist who found hope in the Church and went on to help draft the U.N.'s Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Jacques Maritain (1882-1973)

As a young man, he went to the University of Paris to study the natural sciences. There, he met his future wife, Ra?ssa, a Russian Jewish immigrant. Before marrying, however, he and Ra?ssa became convinced that scientism could not answer existential questions about life. In 1901, in light of this disillusionment, they made a pact to commit suicide together if they could not discover some deeper meaning to life within a year. Fortunately, a friend recommended they attend the lectures of Henri Bergson. Bergson's critique of scientism convinced them of the reality of objective absolutes. Through the influence of L?on Bloy, they converted to the Roman Catholic faith in 1906. Maritain became an famous Catholic philosopher, who's natural law arguments were influential in his participation in the drafting of the U.N.'s Universal Declaration of Human Rights.


Marshall McLuhan

The Virgin Mary told him the Medium is the Message: Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980)

If you haven't heard of Marshall McLuhan, you may have heard his great one-liner, "the medium is the message". He was a prolific writer and is considered a founding father of the new discipline media ecology (the Media Ecology Association's annual conference last year celebrated what would have been his 100th birthday). Research for his doctoral dissertation at Oxford led him to the Church Fathers, whom he read to study their kinds of argumentation. The writings of G.K. Chesterton were influential, and he eventually joined the Catholic Church.

He was a daily Mass goer, and apparently claimed that the Blessed Virgin Mary somehow provided him direct intellectual guidance. A collection of his writings on religion has been posthumously published as The Medium and the Light (fascinating read), in which he argues, among other things, that the microphone is what killed the Latin Mass. Apparently, many in the field still don't know that he was Catholic and aren't aware of his writings on religion. A friend of mine presented a paper on McLuhan's religious beliefs at a conference recently and told me that the first thing the moderator said following his presentation was: "...I knew he was religious...but I...didn't know it was that bad."

Posted by Brantly Millegan

'Practical Atheism' More Destructive Than Disbelief, Pope Says




At his weekly general audience, the Holy Father proposes three methods of discovering God in today’s disbelieving world.


VATICAN CITY — The practical atheism of those who say they are Christian but live as if God does not exist is a greater threat than actual atheism, Pope Benedict XVI said as he presented three ways for people to more fully discover God.

Foodstamps Surge By Most In One Year To New All Time Record



 
 
 
While there had been speculation that the BLS may delay the release of its October nonfarm payroll number until after the election, it turned out there was no reason to worry. Perhaps this is because the number, while at stall speed, was not quite as horrible as some had expected (even if the change in average hourly earnings did tumble to new all time lows) and so boosted Obama's reelection chances. There was, however, another closely tracked number which perhaps is far more indicative of the economic "growth" in the past 4 years, which certainly had a delayed release. The number of course is that showing how many Americans are on foodstamps, and usually is released at the end of the month, or the first day or two of the next month. This time the USDA delayed its release nine days past the semi-official deadline, far past the election, and until Friday night to report August foodstamp data. One glance at the number reveals why: at 47.1 million, this was not only a new all time record, but the monthly increase of 420,947 from July was the biggest monthly increase in one year. One can see why a reported surge in foodstamps ahead of the elections is something the USDA, and the administration may not have been too keen on disclosing.
Foodstamps at the household level also rose to a record 22.685 million:
Finally, going back to the start of the official start of the depression in December 2007. In the 57 months from then until August 2012, there have been 4.6 million jobs lost even as Americans on foodstamps and disability have risen by 21.2 million.
And the same shown on a monthly basis:
 
 

After Obama win, U.S. backs new U.N. arms treaty talks

 
Hours after U.S. President Barack Obama was re-elected, the United States backed a U.N. committee's call on Wednesday to renew debate over a draft international treaty to regulate the $70 billion global conventional arms trade.
 
Submitted by : Claire gooski
 
 

Bill Ayers: ‘Dear President Obama: Congratulations!’

 
 
Among the well-wishers for President Obama’s triumphant re-election is Chicago pal and domestic terrorist-turned-professor Bill Ayers.
 
 
 
“Dear President Obama: Congratulations!
 
 Submitted by : Claire gooski
 
 

The Coming Age Of Austerity

By Pat Buchanan

Are the good times really over for good?” asked Merle Haggard in his 1982 lament.
Then, the good times weren’t over. In fact, they were coming back, with the Reagan recovery, the renewal of the American spirit and the end of a Cold War that had consumed so much of our lives.
Yet no matter the outcome of yesterday’s election, it is hard to be sanguine about the future.
The demographic and economic realities do not permit it.
Consider. Between 1946 and 1964, 79 million babies were born – the largest, best-educated and most successful generation in our history. Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, both born in 1946, were in that first class of baby boomers.


Click Here to Read Full Article»

Submitted by : Claire gooski
 

Obama’s re-election is a tragedy, for the US and the world. Now his second term will be overshadowed, as the Benghazigate cover-up unravels



The tragedy is not just that Obama has been a bad president; it’s that Romney would have been a good one
 
By William Oddie on Wednesday, 7 November 2012

Submitted by : Claire gooski

The Pre-Post Mortem




November 6, 2012 - 8:38 pm - by Stephen Green


As I write this, the election is not yet decided. But it doesn’t look good for Romney, and it’s over for the Senate. But even if Romney does pull out a squeaker, what follows still holds true.
Tonight’s mystery is, there were constituencies which should have flocked to Romney after years of legal and extra-legal assaults. “Catholics and coal,” I said earlier.

Yet they didn’t.

Why didn’t they?

 Was it the largess of the last four years? Perhaps. If so, they’ll perhaps be hurt the most when one of two things happen. Either the gravy train will stop (was that Ryan’s threat to them?), or Obama will simply put them out of business. The Catholic church as an independent entity in this country is already an endangered species thanks to ObamaCare’s mandates. And we know exactly what Obama intends to (finish) doing to the coal industry. So why didn’t they turn the Industrial Midwest and the Great Lakes red tonight? I’m afraid they were bought off. I very much fear their bitterness when the gravy train does stop, as it must. Their reaction will be angry and unpredictable.
And that’s where I misread this electorate. It used to be a pretty sure thing in a democracy that, when the guy you supported screwed you, you would go with the other guy. Because in the end, that’s the only way to keep politicians somewhat honest. But when the Fed can conjure up trillions, when Congress can ease things along with continuing resolutions, when the White House has unprecedented power to punish its enemies and reward its friends…

…how, in these circumstances, do we keep the bastards honest?
We had a chance — not a great chance, but a real one — to stanch the bleeding. We failed to do so.
I fear that means we’re a country in deep denial of just what kind of a hole we’re in, and how much deeper we’ll be in it after another four years of spending-by-autopilot.
We can blame the candidate, sure. Romney didn’t fully capitalize on his first-debate win, and apparently the Chris Christie/Barack Obama lovefest turned a lot of votes back to the president, too. But overall, Romney ran almost as competent a challenger’s campaign as I’ve seen.
We can blame the press, sure. Benghazi alone would have sunk most presidents — most Republican presidents — in weeks if not days. The coverup by the Complicit Media was shameful in the extreme. But we’ve faced down the MSM before, and won.
So, no, I don’t think we can just blame Romney and I don’t think we can just blame the press. Even combined, those two aren’t enough to explain what happened today.
There is something deeply wrong with our country. We’ve been living on borrowed time — and trillions of borrowed dollars — for a decade already. We seem to think that we can keep on doing so. That more than anything else is “the new normal.”

Thomas Jefferson famously said of the slavery issue, “I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever.” I tremble for my country when I think that the God of Compound Interest is a far more jealous God than Jahweh, Allah, and Zuul all wrapped up into a single, bloody package.
Maybe that truth — the truth — doesn’t sell in a country that’s been suffering for four years now, and with no real end in sight.
This election should have been something like a walkover for the challenger. But no. Our economic destiny is already written in stone, with four trillion in new debt run up by Bush and the GOP, and another six trillion by Obama and the Democrats. Our only hope is rapid and wrenching reform. The alternative is hyperinflation, Cloward-Piven, and all the rest of the Zimbabwe-like horror.
And that means Mitt Romney didn’t fail us. That means people like me — people like you — failed our country. We had years to make the case, and we didn’t. We worked our bottoms off, but it wasn’t enough.

So we must redouble our efforts.
If Obama wins tonight, as seems likely, he has no mandate. He ran on a platform of “Mitt Romney is teh sux.” I’m not sure how that translates into a governing platform, and neither is anyone else. If Romney pulls this out, he’ll have a hostile Senate for at least the first half of his term.
Either way, we’re looking at deadlock.
It’s our job, yours and mine, to pick that lock. Do not tire, do not flag, do not quit.
If Romney wins, he will need us to constantly push him in the direction of sanity. If Obama wins, we will need to fight him at every turn.
I’m not quitting. Don’t you quit now, either.


Syrian shells hit town in northern Israel





Three mortar shells fired by Syrian forces landed near and in the Golan Heights community of Alonei Habashan early Thursday morning. One shell landed in a local neighborhood, but caused no injuries or damage.
Officials said they believe the shells were misfires from a battle between Syrian government and rebel forces just over the border.
But the frequency of cross-border attacks lately, and the growing accuracy, suggests the Syrians may be purposely targeting Israel.
Earlier this week, an Israeli army patrol jeep came under fire from the Syrian side of the border, and last week three Syrian tanks briefly entered Israel.
Israeli forces in the north of the country were placed on high alert following the border breach, and Israeli army chief Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz warned that "the Syrian affair could turn into our affair."
The IDF division stationed in the northern Golan "is ready for any moment in which the shooting will change direction and will be turned on us," an Israeli army spokesman was quoted as saying by The Jerusalem Post.
Israel remains concerned that either side in the Syrian conflict could at any time try to draw Israel into the fighting for its own political and military gain. Should that happen, there is little doubt Lebanon's Hizballah terrorist militia would enter the fray and launch its missile arsenal at northern Israel.

International Space Station





Did you know you can see the International Space Station from your house? As the third brightest object in the sky, after the sun and moon, the space station is easy to see if you know where and when to look for it.



How to Spring a Soul from Purgatory in 4 Steps

 
 
 
 
According to the current Enchiridion of Indulgences, one can apply a plenary indulgence to a departed soul by the "visitation of a cemetary" {Coemeterii visitatio} from November 1st till the 8th (i.e. the octave of All Saints).
 
 
by Dr. Taylor Marshall
 
Here's the text:
13. Visit to a Cemetery (Coemeterii visitatio)
An indulgence, applicable only to the Souls in Purgatory, is granted to the faithful, who devoutly visit a cemetery and pray, even if only mentally, for the departed.
The indulgence is plenary each day from the 1st to the 8th of November; on other days of the year it is partial.
In order for the indulgence to be plenary, the following conditions must also be met alone with the visit and prayers at the cemetery:
Sacramental confession within ?about twenty days?[1] of the actual day of the Plenary Indulgence.
Eucharistic Communion on the day of the Plenary Indulgence.
Prayer for the intentions of the Pope on the day of the Plenary Indulgence.
It is further required that all attachment to sin, even venial sin, be absent.[2]
Taking young people, particularly teenagers, to cemeteries to pray for the dead is a wholesome thing. Young people are not usually aware of their mortality. It's a good thing to recognize the tombs of the dead...and pray for them.
Perhaps our culture's fascination with death and horror movies is related to the fact that young people are isolated from death and prevented from attending funerals. Do you agree? Please leave a comment.

Where to put your money now that Obama has won?


Poll inspectors being ousted for Dems

 

November 6, 2012 | 8:31 am

 
By Paul Bedard



1November surprise: EPA planning major post-election anti-coal regulation

2Barone: Going out on a limb: Romney beats Obama, handily

3Examiner experts predict presidential race

4Prediction: Obama wins narrow Electoral College victory

5Flashback: Nate Silver gave Sharron Angle a 75 percent chance of winning


Court-appointed Republican poll inspectors are being forcibly removed from voting stations in some Philadelphia wards and replaced in some cases by Democratic inspectors and even members of the Black Panthers, according to GOP officials.

Secrets just received this memo from GOP officials:



The Philadelphia GOP is reporting that court appointed Minority (read GOP) Inspectors are being thrown out of polling locations in several Wards.



These Inspectors are election officials - again, court appointed -- and are reportedly being thrown out by the Head Judges of Elections (these Judges are elected Democrats) and being replaced by Democrats.


This has happened at the following locations:


Ward 32, Div 13


Ward 43, Div 14


Ward 56, Div 1


Ward 56, Div 22


Ward 32, Div 28


Ward 32, Div 28


Ward 12, Div 17


Ward 39, Div 1


Ward 24, Div 9


Ward 18, Div 25


Ward 43, Div 14


Ward 29, Div 18


Ward 65, Div 19


Ward 20, Div 1


Ward 6, Div 11


Another official told Secrets: "one of our female inspectors was physically thrown out."

Presidential candidate Mitt Romney decided at the last minute to make stops in Pennsylvania, believing that the race there was close enough that he could win.

 
 
 





An election day prayer

An election day prayer

 

Let nothing disturb you,
Let nothing frighten you,
All things are passing away:
God never changes.
Patience obtains all things
Whoever has God lacks nothing;
God alone suffices.
St. Teresa of Avila

This is true regardless of how the election turns out. I know this is a message I must be reminded of to keep from falling into a nervous tension awaiting results. Regardless who wins we are still called to be saints and repentance and overcoming our own sins is a daily shovel-ready job.

 


 
Submitted by : Claire gooski
 
 
 

2016 Movie & Barack Obama's America w/ Dinesh D'Souza & Glenn Beck Radio Unmaking USA


 
 
 



2016 Movie Book "Obama's America: Unmaking the American Dream" by Dinesh D'Souza on the Radio with Glenn Beck http://www.GlennBecksBookList.com for the book click here: http://www.bit.ly/ObamasAmerica. Also read "The Roots of Obama's Rage" http://www.bit.ly/ObamaRage

America as we know it—wealthy, powerful, assertive—is not what Obama wants. He wants a smaller America, a poorer America, an America unable to exert its will, an America happy to be one power among many, an America in decline so that other nations might rise—all in the name of global fairness. To Obama, the hated "one percent" isn't just wealthy Americas; it is America itself. In Obama's view, America needs to be taken down a notch.

That is the startling conclusion of bestselling author Dinesh D'Souza in Obama's America. Building on his previous New York Times bestseller The Roots of Obama's Rage—which Newt Gingrich called "Stunning...the most profound insight I have read in the last six years"—D'Souza shows how Obama's goal to downsize America is in plain sight but ignored by everyone.

D'Souza lays out what Obama plans to do in a second administration—a makeover of America so drastic that the "shining city on a hill" will become a shantytown in a rather dangerous global village. Arresting in its presentation and sobering in its conclusions, Obama's America is essential reading for those who want to change America's course before it's too late.



Why America is Better Than Europe




Stu breaks down the astonishing numbers to reveal how the differences in cultural mindsets have caused Europe to stagnate and the U.S. to flourish. Watch to see what sets America apart from Europe and the rest of the world. http://TheBlaze.com/TV


STUTISTICS: Unemployment Under Obama



In this episode of Stutistics, Stu give you the real unemployment numbers.



Obama's Budget v. Reality Part 1 & 2





The numbers are based on Obama's federal budget for 2012. The budget for 2013 has since come out, and the numbers are similar—just a little worse in many cases. **Remember, we're not using our estimates for what he's going to spend. These are his numbers.




Stu breaks down the astonishing numbers to reveal how the differences in cultural mindsets have caused Europe to stagnate and the U.S. to flourish. Watch to see what sets America apart from Europe and the rest of the world. http://TheBlaze.com/TV






Liberal Group Asks IRS to Investigate Catholic Church for Alleged Political Activity










                                                                                                         Bishop Daniel Jenky, diocese of Peoria, Ill.

(CNSNews.com) ? Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), late Friday, filed a formal complaint asking the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to investigate the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops for allegedly engaging in prohibited political activity in violation of its nonprofit tax status.
The CREW complaint alleges that the nation?s Catholic bishops are ?abusing their positions to advocate against the election of President Barack Obama,? and anticipated further actions during this weekend?s sermons.
 The complaint mentions several bishops -- including Nicholas Di Marzio in New York; David Ricken in Wisconsin; Edward J. Burns in Alaska and Paul Loverde in Virginia -- who it said have ?warned of the evils of the Obama administration, followed by an exhortation for Catholics to vote.?
 CREW also alleges that some bishops ?have cautioned that voting for Democrats would not be faithful to Christ and would endanger the soul.?
But the complaint zeroed in on Illinois Bishop Daniel Jenky, who, the liberal activist group said, ?previously compared President Obama to Stalin and Hitler.?
 CREW objected to the fact that the traditionalist bishop of Peoria, Ill., is ?requiring every priest in his diocese to read a statement accusing the administration of an ?assault upon our religious freedom . . . simply without precedent in the American political and legal system,?? according to the complaint.
He warns that those who fail to heed his warning have no hope of salvation and urging every practicing Catholic to vote,? the liberal activist group said in a news release accompanying the IRS complaint.
In completely unqualified terms, the IRS should immediately tell the Conference of Catholic Bishops that the conduct of its members is beyond the pale,? CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan stated in the release.
To qualify for tax exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, nonprofit organizations must not participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office.
 If the Catholic bishops would like to continue receiving the tremendous tax benefits on which they rely, they should follow U.S. law and stay out of American politics,? she said.
The USCCB did not respond to weekend attempts by CNSNews.com to elicit comment.
But in a guideline for political activity issued on the USCCB Web site, the bishops? Office of General Counsel made it clear that under the law, ?(t)he political campaign intervention prohibition does not prevent a Catholic organization from addressing the moral aspects of public policy issues or from pursuing its legislative advocacy program during election campaign periods.?
The bishops? top legal counsel also noted: ?The fact that the positions of particular candidates may align with the advocacy positions of Catholic organizations does not alone taint an issue communication.
For the IRS to consider issue advocacy to be a violation of the ban on political activity, ?there must be some reasonably overt indication in the communication to the reader, viewer, or listener that the organization supports or opposes a particular candidate (or slate of candidates) in an election, rather than being a message restricted to an issue,? the Catholic legal counsel noted.
God is Not Mocked?
Bishop Jenky?s controversial letter, as CNSNews.com reported last week, did not call for Catholics to vote for or against any candidate.
The letter, which was slated to be read at all masses in the Catholic churches of the diocese of Peoria, Ill., over the weekend, did equate pro-abortion Catholic politicians and the people who vote for them with the biblical mob that chose Caesar over Jesus Christ, and warns that ?God is not mocked.?
Jenky wrote that 2,000 years ago, ?after our Savior had been bound, beaten, scourged, mocked, and crowned with thorns, a pagan Roman Procurator displayed Jesus to a hostile crowd by sarcastically declaring: ?Behold your King.? The mob roared back: ?We have no king but Caesar.??
Today, Catholic politicians, bureaucrats, and their electoral supporters who callously enable the destruction of innocent human life in the womb also thereby reject Jesus as their Lord,? Jenky wrote.
They are objectively guilty of grave sin. For those who hope for salvation, no political loyalty can ever take precedence over loyalty to the Lord Jesus Christ and to his Gospel of Life.?
God is not mocked,? the bishop wrote, ?and as the Bible clearly teaches, after this passing instant of life on earth, God?s great mercy in time will give way to God?s perfect judgment in eternity.?
Jenky?s letter also criticized the Health and Human Services mandate under Obamacare ? a regulation that requires nearly all health insurance plans to offer contraceptives, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs free of charge.
Since the foundation of the American Republic and the adoption of the Bill of Rights, I do not think there has ever been a time more threatening to our religious liberty than the present,? Jenky wrote.
Neither the president of the United States nor the current majority of the Federal Senate have been willing to even consider the Catholic community?s grave objections to those HHS mandates that would require all Catholic institutions, exempting only our church buildings, to fund abortion, sterilization, and artificial contraception.?
 This assault upon our religious freedom is simply without precedent in the American political and legal system,? Jenky wrote.
 Contrary to the guarantees embedded in the First Amendment, the HHS mandate attempts to now narrowly define and thereby drastically limit our traditional religious works.
They grossly and intentionally intrude upon the deeply held moral convictions that have always guided our Catholic schools, hospitals, and other apostolic ministries.?
In concluding his letter, the bishop simply wrote: ?I therefore call upon every practicing Catholic in this Diocese to vote. Be faithful to Christ and to your Catholic Faith.?
The diocese of Peoria, which is in central Illinois, has a Catholic population of approximately 196,000.

 By Pete Winn

Submitted by : Claire gooski

Amity Shlaes on his bad economic choices

 


EXHIBIT #10

When it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s,? President Obama told Mitt Romney in their final debate.



Obama got sloppy here. Presumably, the president was suggesting the 1920s represent economic failure. The decade represents just the opposite, as measured by the very goals on which the Democrats base their 2012 presidential campaign.

Growth: Obama has spoken often and forcefully about economic growth. In just one debate, the second one, the president used the term ?grow? when discussing the economy 13 times, whereas Romney said ?grow? or ?growth? eight times. The 1920s had strong growth: Real gross domestic product increased an average of 4 percent per annum.

Higher wages for skilled workers: ?I want high-wage, high-skill jobs,? Obama has said. Weekly wages increased in the 1920s, especially in the president?s preferred area ? higher-skilled jobs. Overcoming joblessness, Obama has said, matters hugely to our future.

?We?ve seen 30 consecutive, 31 consecutive months of job growth, 5.2 million new jobs created,? the president said in the second debate. The actual unemployment rate currently sits at 7.8%, and the Obama case remains that more stimulus and support are necessary. Contrast that with the 1920s. Confronting a jobless rate of 11.7% in 1921, policymakers acted by cutting the federal budget. Unemployment slipped to 6.7% and then to 2.4% by 1923, according to the Historical Statistics of the United States.

Innovation is important to Obama. As he said earlier this year: ?We are inventors. We are builders. We?re the makers of things. We?re Thomas Edison and the Wright brothers and Steve Jobs.? In the 1920s, patent applications for inventions, the barometer for innovation, averaged more than 80,000 a year, a level they didn?t reach again until the 1960s. Such newer inventions made Edison?s light bulb and the Wright brothers? airplanes common in our society. The 1920s roar was loud and real.

Overall, the 1920s data are estimable. Americans got telephones, fans and Model T?s and A?s. Even income distribution relative to taxes, a favored Democratic metric, became more favorable: The rich paid a greater share of the income tax by the end of the decade.

One can hazard two guesses as to why Obama slams the 1920s. The first is that the 1920s were followed by the 1930s, a decade of high unemployment when policies of federal intervention were closer to his own. The easiest way to protect the 1930s programs from criticism is to argue that the 1930s Depression was caused by 1920s policies.

This argument is a stretch; to hang a whole decade of trouble on, say, President Calvin Coolidge, or the 1929 crash, is hard to do. Economists themselves have long since concluded that the troubles of the 1930s had many causes. The stock-market crash of 1929 could have been like those of 1987 or 2000 ? rough but quick. Other factors, including foreign monetary policy, did damage.

Additional domestic programs, mostly the responsibility of Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt, the presidents from the 1930s, made the Depression deeper, as well. Especially damaging, as the scholar Lee Ohanian has shown, was a then-new policy of placing upward pressures on wages through either presidential exhortation (Herbert Hoover) or law: the Davis-Bacon Act (Hoover), the Wagner Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act (Franklin D. Roosevelt).

The second reason the president might want to slam the 1920s is that the policies responsible for such strong performance in that decade are ones of which Obama, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and perhaps Romney disapprove. Today, all politicians avoid recession at all cost. The Fed and Treasury raised interest rates sharply after World War I, even though everyone knew a recession would result.

Combating inflation and stabilizing the dollar seemed more important than avoiding a recession. Today, politicians like stimulus. Back then, over a matter of just a few years, the federal government cut its size in half. In the 1920s, presidents and Congress cut tax rates often. The top rate on the income tax, which Obama would like to raise, was cut to 25% from more than 50%.

Why not allow the president his cheap conceit? For the same reason we want to call Romney on his lazy argument that Chinese currency manipulation, rather than our own lack of relative competitiveness, causes US troubles.

The 1920s are crucial. If we don?t know what really happened then, then we can?t know what is possible now. Recently Romney produced a commercial announcing that he and Obama saw ?two very different paths for the country.? In the coming days, Americans must choose between those paths. That?s especially hard to do when the country?s past ? the paths behind ? are kept in the dark.

Submitted by : Claire gooski