by Francis Cardinal George, O.M.I
October is the month of the Most Holy Rosary, a devotion associated in
modern times with the apparitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary at Fatima in 1917,
during the First World War. Mary asked for prayer and penance, which she always
requests in these private revelations that echo the public revelation in the
Gospel: ?Repent, the kingdom of God is at hand.?
Mary at Fatima also entered into the history of the modern world when she
told three unlettered peasant children that the Great War then being waged,
President Wilson?s ?war to end all wars,? would soon end, but that a greater
menace to world peace would arise in Russia, whose errors would spread
throughout the world and bring untold millions to violent death. In the end,
however, Mary promised that her Immaculate Heart would triumph. This promise,
too, echoes the Gospel itself: the risen Christ is victorious over sin and
death.
Eternity enters into human history in often incomprehensible ways. God
makes promises but gives no timelines. Visiting the shrine at Fatima, pilgrims
enter a huge plaza, with the spot of the apparitions marked by a small chapel to
one side, a large church at one end, an equally large adoration chapel at the
other end, and a center for visitors and for the hearing of confessions. Just
outside the main grounds, a section of the Berlin Wall has been re-built, a
stark witness to what Mary had talked about almost a century ago. Communism in
Russia and its satellite nations has collapsed, although many of its sinful
effects are still with us.
Communism imposed a total way of life based upon the belief that God does
not exist. Secularism is communism?s better-scrubbed bedfellow. A small irony of
history cropped up at the United Nations a few weeks ago when Russia joined the
majority of other nations to defeat the United States and the western European
nations that wanted to declare that killing the unborn should be a universal
human right. Who is on the wrong side of history now?
The present political campaign has brought to the surface of our public
life the anti-religious sentiment, much of it explicitly anti-Catholic, that has
been growing in this country for several decades. The secularizing of our
culture is a much larger issue than political causes or the outcome of the
current electoral campaign, important though that is.
Speaking a few years ago to a group of priests, entirely outside of the
current political debate, I was trying to express in overly dramatic fashion
what the complete secularization of our society could bring. I was responding to
a question and I never wrote down what I said, but the words were captured on
somebody?s smart phone and have now gone viral on Wikipedia and elsewhere in the
electronic communications world. I am (correctly) quoted as saying that I
expected to die in bed, my successor will die in prison and his successor will
die a martyr in the public square. What is omitted from the reports is a final
phrase I added about the bishop who follows a possibly martyred bishop: ?His
successor will pick up the shards of a ruined society and slowly help rebuild
civilization, as the church has done so often in human history.? What I said is
not ?prophetic? but a way to force people to think outside of the usual
categories that limit and sometimes poison both private and public
discourse.
An earlier Archbishop of Chicago once tried his hand at reading the signs
of his times. On May 18, 1937, Cardinal Mundelein, in a conference to priests of
the archdiocese, called the then-German chancellor ?an Austrian paper-hanger,
and a darn poor one at that, I am told.? Why did Cardinal Mundelein speak in a
way that drew applause from the New York Times and local papers and brought the
German government to complain bitterly to the Holy See? The government of
Germany, declaring its ideology the wave of the future, had dissolved Catholic
youth groups and tried to discredit the church?s work among young people through
trials of monks, priests and religious sisters accused of immorality. Cardinal
Mundelein spoke of how the public protests of the bishops had been silenced in
the German media, leaving the church in Germany more ?helpless? than it had ever
been.
He then added: ?There is no guarantee that the battle-front may not stretch
some day into our own land. Hodie mihi cras tibi. (Today it?s me; tomorrow,
you). If we show no interest in this matter now, if we shrug our shoulders and
mutter ? it is not our fight, if we don?t back up the Holy Father when we have a
chance, well, when our turn comes, we too will be fighting alone.?
?When our turn comes ?? Was Cardinal Mundelein a prophet as well as an
administrative genius? Hardly. At his death in 1939 he was well known as an
American patriot and a friend of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, but he also
had a Catholic conviction that no nation state has been immaculately conceived.
The unofficial anthem of secularism today is John Lennon?s ?Imagine,? in which
we are encouraged to imagine a world without religion. We don?t have to imagine
such a world; the 20th century has given us horrific examples of such
worlds.
Instead of a world living in peace because it is without religion, why not
imagine a world without nation states? After all, there would be no American
ambassador recently killed in Libya if there were no America and no Libya! There
are, obviously, individuals and groups who still misuse religion as a reason for
violent behavior, but modern nation states don?t need religion as an excuse for
going to war. Every major war in the last 300 years has been fought by nation
states, not by the church. In our own history, the re-conquest of the
secessionist states in the Civil War was far bloodier than the re-conquest of
the Holy Land by the now despised Crusaders. The state apparatus for
investigating civilians now is far more extensive than anything dreamed up by
the Spanish Inquisition, although both were created to serve the same purpose:
to preserve a government?s public ideology and control of society, whether based
on religion or on modern constitutional order.
Analogies can easily be multiplied, if one wants to push a thesis; but the
point is that the greatest threat to world peace and international justice is
the nation state gone bad, claiming an absolute power, deciding questions and
making ?laws? beyond its competence. Few there are, however, who would venture
to ask if there might be a better way for humanity to organize itself for the
sake of the common good. Few, that is, beyond a prophetic voice like that of
Dorothy Day, speaking acerbically about ?Holy Mother the State,? or the
ecclesiastical voice that calls the world, from generation to generation, to
live at peace in the kingdom of God.
God sustains the world, in good times and in bad. Catholics, along with
many others, believe that only one person has overcome and rescued history:
Jesus Christ, Son of God and Son of the Virgin Mary, savior of the world and
head of his body, the church. Those who gather at his cross and by his empty
tomb, no matter their nationality, are on the right side of history. Those who
lie about him and persecute or harass his followers in any age might imagine
they are bringing something new to history, but they inevitably end up ringing
the changes on the old human story of sin and oppression. There is nothing
?progressive? about sin, even when it is promoted as ?enlightened.?
The world divorced from the God who created and redeemed it inevitably
comes to a bad end. It?s on the wrong side of the only history that finally
matters. The Synod on the New Evangelization is taking place in Rome this month
because entire societies, especially in the West, have placed themselves on the
wrong side of history. This October, let?s pray the rosary so that the Holy
Spirit will guide and strengthen the bishops and others at the synod as they
deliberate about the challenges to preaching and living the Gospel at this
moment in human history.
This column first appeared in the Catholic New World, the newspaper of the
Archdiocese of Chicago, for October 21 ? November 3, 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment