Liberals Now Turning On The Father Of Our Country

Image result for George Washington

Liberals Now Turning on "Slave Owner" George Washington 

Matt Haney, the president of the San Francisco School Board, can reduce the father of our country down to just two words: Slave owner. And for that reason, Haney says, we should not be sending kids to schools that are named after George Washington.

“We should rename Washington High School after San Francisco native, poet and author Maya Angelou,” Haney said in a tweet last Sunday. “Maya Angelou High School. No schools named after slave owners.”

According to a story in the Los Angeles Times, Haney was inspired to this wisdom by his pastor, who recently preached about the Colin Kaepernick ordeal. The pastor – Rev. Amos Brown – took issue with Francis Scott Key and other figures in American history who might have had outdated feelings about black people:

In a phone interview Wednesday, Haney said that it wasn’t just schools named after slave owners that should be renamed. So should those named after anyone with a questionable human rights record.

“We want to make sure the full diversity of our community is reflected,” Haney said.

Is Haney even slightly aware of the fact that we might not even have a country called the “United States of America” if it were not for George Washington? What, exactly, would be different if it were not for Maya Angelou? Some things, probably, but somehow it seems unlikely that her absence from American history would greatly change today’s society. Oh, but yeah, she was black, so that makes her just as important as any old fuddy-duddy white man.

And, really, it’s not fair to drag Angelou through this. She’s not the one making ridiculous assertions about the founding fathers, although she had some, um, interesting things to say every now and again.

No, this is all about the new liberal agenda, which is focused on destroying everything that came before the modern Democratic Party. It’s not even about race or slavery; those are just convenient excuses to throw out the history books and replace them with propaganda. The real goal is to untether America from its founding and everything that includes: God, the Constitution, and an unforgiving stance against tyranny.

Those are the things standing in the way of the ultimate goals of the liberal movement. And one way or the other, the left is determined to see them die.



What do you think about this?

Comments:

One must look at the nature of the slavery. Slavery existed in Christ's time. How did Washington treat his slaves? My family came to America as indentured to the rail roads (another form of slavery). Every able bodied male was required to work building the railroads across America in repayment of the debt for passage across the Atlantic. Where would this country be without those railroads? If you are going to eliminate public names because they condoned slavery, then start with Democrats who have continued since the civil war to subjugate blacks in one way or another. Keeping people on welfare is a form of slavery "to the government".




Well there goes Barack Obama...his name can never be adorned on any building, street, museum, or stadium...His ancestors were slave traders...they captured other black tribes people and sold/traded em to the dutch slave traders...who brought em to American and sold em to southern plantation owners...Yep...strike the name of Barack Obama from the history books while the literate liberals proclaim victory over the likes of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and scores of other early Americans who help found this country by signing their name on a document known as the Declaration of Independence...names that made this country "great"...names that made history...and names that will make this country "great again".

What will happen here, is that Obama and his likes, will change the history books to reflect exactly what he wants them to. Truth doesn't count with them so they just eradicate the truth or change the truth to lies to get the effect they want.

OBAMA IS NOT GONE YET, HE IS A MUSLIM, HE AND CLINTON WHO HAS TAKEN MILLIONS OF ARAB MONEY ARE TRYING TO BRING THOUSANDS ON TOP OF THOUSANDS MORE MUSLIMS INTO THIS COUNTRY ON TOP OF WHAT THEY ALREADY HAVE. WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THE AMMO THEY TRIED TO BUY UP A COUPLE YEARS AGO
WHY TRY AND TAKE OUR GUNS, COULD IT BE THAT THEY HAVE SET US UP FOR A MUSLIM INVASION THIS YEAR. 35 MUSLIM CAMPS AND A FEMA CAMP IN EACH STATE, SOME STATES MORE THAN ONE, PAID BY TAXPAYERS MONEY.

RIGHT NOW, OUR BASES ARE NOTHING BUT KILLING FIELDS, OUR TROOPS ARE NOT ARMED. I SAY EVERY SOLDIER AND EVERY GI SHOULD CARRY ARMS TODAY. PLUS EVERY LICENSED HUNTER AND CITIZEN. WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO CARRY ANY AND EVERY WHERE AND IF IT WAS NOT FOR BUS CHASING ATTORNEYS, WE COULD WITHOUT HARASSMENT.


Source:>>>>Here

Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

Friends Of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.


No comments:

Post a Comment