“A nickel isn’t worth a dime today”
On
Sept. 22, 2011 in a speech to business executives Navy Adm. Mike Mullen,
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said, “Debt
is the biggest threat to U.S. national security.” When the leader of the people
famous for $800
hammers and $640
toilet seats has to lecture business leaders about the perils of deficit
spending we know capitalism in America has jumped the track.
After
World War I the world’s monetary system was in disarray. The victorious Allies
sought to revive the gold standard. However the structure which had been put in
place after 1918 collapsed during the Great Depression. Some economists believe
that the world’s attempt to remain on the gold standard prevented central banks
from expanding the money supply enough to revive the world’s economies.
After
World War II, representatives of the once again victorious allies met at Bretton
Woods, New Hampshire, to create a new international monetary system. At the time
the United States accounted for more than 50% of the world's manufacturing
capacity and also held most of the world's gold. Since America was the
uncontested economic Superpower these leaders decided to tie world currencies to
the dollar. The value of the dollar would in turn be controlled and supported
by the fact that the dollar would be tied to gold at $35 per ounce.
While
the Bretton
Woods System was in force the central banks were given the task of
maintaining fixed exchange rates. This was accomplished by massive and
continuous intervention in foreign exchange markets. When a country's currency
became too expensive in relation to the dollar, that country’s central bank
would sell its currency for dollars thus driving down the value of its
currency. And if the value of a country's money became too low, that country
would then aggressively buy its own currency to drive the price up.
This
Bretton Woods System worked well until 1971. By then, due to the “Guns
and Butter” economic policies of the Johnson and Nixon administrations inflation in the
United States and
America’s rapidly expanding trade
deficit undermined the value of the dollar. As a result America urged the
now recovered and economically powerful Germany and Japan to increase the value of
their currencies. Both nations did not want to do this. Raising the value of
their currencies hurt their exports by increasing the prices for their goods in
the United States which was their largest market.
When
the pressure became unbearable, when too many nations were redeeming too many
dollars against America’s dwindling gold supply the United States
unilaterally abandoned the fixed gold value of the dollar allowing it to
"float." Floating with relationship to money means it is allowed to fluctuate
when compared to the currencies of other countries. Immediately the value of the
dollar fell substantially when compared to other currencies, especially those of
Germany and Japan.
This
caused turbulence in the economies of nations and sent shockwaves through the
political systems of the world. In consequence the leaders of the major
countries made an effort to revive the Bretton
Woods system. They came together in 1971, and reached the Smithsonian
Agreement which for the first time allowed for the negotiation of fixed
exchange rates. However, this attempt soon failed.
In
1973, The United States and the other major economic powers agreed to a new
system known as Managed
Float. This meant that central banks would still intervene with the buying
and selling of their own currencies to eliminate any changes that might be
perceived as too dramatic.
How
long will this system of floating money, fiat currency, and systemic debt
last?
Since
I started with a quote from my favorite American philosopher, Yogi Berra I will
frame my comments about the end result of America’s love affair with monopoly
money and ever growing debt with another
nugget from this source of double think profundity, "It's tough to make
predictions, especially about the future"
You
know, I know and anyone who has enough economic awareness to realize you can’t
spend more than you make forever knows that our present governmental financial
framework is unsustainable. Why? Apparently our leaders believe you can spend
more than you make forever.
If
you have ever tried to manage your Visa payments by charging them to MasterCard
you know the end of that game. Our leaders have pawned our grandchildren’s
future for the votes they buy with social programs, tax give-aways, and
bail-outs. However it is hard to lay all the blame on the shoulders of the
perpetually re-elected. The government is the people writ large. Almost every
household in America is in debt. Almost every business in America is in
debt.
Debt
is not a bad thing in and of itself. Actually it is one of the most liberating
inventions in the world. It allows economic activity to grow based upon future
activity instead of just on current holdings. This provides a multiplier effect
that has given rise to the modern world.
However,
when we spend more of the future than the present can service we have inverted
the pyramid and are inviting a correction. Even if the Corporations Once Known
as the Mainstream Media are blathering on about how good the stock market is
doing, that the pretend unemployment rate is falling, that there is no
inflation, and that the President says everything is getting better, the
alternative media knows the present course is unsustainable. Unsustainable.
That word is spoken day after day on Fox and printed multiple times every day
online from thousands of blogs, magazines, and newspapers. All it means is it
can’t last forever, or as an alarmist might say, “A crash is coming!”
Sure
the stock market is flying high. With the Fed pumping 85 billion a month into
the banking system why wouldn’t it? With that kind of money coming in why not
play the Lotto? Sure the unemployment rate is falling as long as you don’t
count the people who have quit looking for a job. Sure there’s no inflation as
long as you don’t count energy or food. And of course the President says
everything is getting better all the time that is what his teleprompter tells
him to say.
So,
how long will this system of floating money, fiat currency, and systemic debt
last? None of us gets to live in the world we grew up in because the world
moves too fast. Things change. What was science fiction yesterday is your cell
phone today. One thing we can know for sure is that it isn’t over till it’s
over. Yet from a realistic evaluation of the deep hole we have spent
ourselves into the future isn’t what it used to
be and if the world were perfect it
wouldn’t be.
Is
there any way to stop this train wreck before we hit the wall? Can we reign in
Washington and stop the 6.85 million per minute that the best and the brightest
are spending? What do you think? The great Tea Party victory of 2010 affirmed
Boehner as the leader of the co-opted opposition, voted for multiple debt
ceiling increases, and renewed the Patriot Act. Do you think another
Progressive Republican à la Romney has a chance to beat Hillary or would make
any difference if they did? I wish I had an
answer to that because I’m tired of answering the question. What do you
think?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment