As a Democratic Party Candidate for President I could not believe when Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders was asked about his "Conscientious Objection" to the Vietnam War and that Hillary Clinton wast not asked how she felt about sending our little girls to WAR when she was protected from a Draft based on being a little girl.
Under an EQUALITY Banner of Military ALL of our little girls 18 - 30 years of age, (especially single or divorced) would be subject to a War Draft. You have to admit that was NOT something Hillary Clinton had to worry about as a little girl, but it is one she is all for TODAY.
How will our little girls grow up? They will undoubtedly suffer pains that Hillary was pleasantly exempted from and undoubtedly basked in the glow of protections afforded her. What seems attractive in Equality sounds very nice when it comes to receiving the same pay, being admitted into the Priesthood of some Church or Club previously exempting women. However, as the October 13,2015 article taken from the very liberal Huffington Post points out, the demands of EQUALITY, are heading for a real disaster for Millennials, who do not even realize Hillary Clinton is marching them to War.
"If the U.S. military prioritizes "true and pure equality," women might eventually have to register for the draft.
So said Army Secretary John McHugh at the Association of the United States Army’s annual meeting in Washington on Monday, reports Military.com. McHugh added that the issue -- if and when it arises -- should be determined by Congress, not the Department of Defense."
THE SHRILL OF POWER RUNNING UP HILLARY CLINTON'S LEG
Desperate for voters, Hillary Clinton has made no bones about it- she's female- and wants you to vote to put the first women in the Office of the President who also acts as the Commander-In-Chief of the whole U.S. Military.
The right to vote in the U.S. was considered an emancipation for females in the previous considerations of sex or gender in the 19th Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The 15th Amendment was ratified in 1870. It defined clearly the right to vote to those regardless of race, color, or previous conditions of servitude, stating:
"The rights of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. This gave men who had been slaves, or incarcerated the right to vote regardless of color, but still did not include women as even U.S. Citizens. It would not be until 1920, 50 years later, that women received this Right under the law of our Constitution through the 19th Amendment ratification.
Many thought this was a grievance of inequality and did not understand the protections it actually was affording. It would have been inconceivable for a father to look at his little girl and think about sending her out to have her legs and arms blown off by mortar shells, her teeth knocked out with the butt of a rifle, or worse her "honor", or "maidenhood" defiled in the brutality of war, but that's where true equality is taking us.
In Jakarta Indonesia women recruited for the military are to be virgins. In a May 2015 Article entitled "Why does Indonesia demand the female recruits are virgins?", A hymen test is described as being used to pass the recruits. It is taken very seriously as a matter of "National Security", said Chief Major General Fuad Basya, referring those who were not virgins more subject to what was termed 'bad habits' and said to be warned against in their military and the defense of the country's security and territory being a very high honor.
Still the hymen test was considered by most recruits and doctors to be 'invasive' in the least, embarrassing, and humiliating, even torture said a female military physician that traumatized recruits, as if in the event of war, that would not be the first thing in jeopardy by the enemy in defiance of the Geneva Convention by rogue partitioners.
Women in the United States are not currently required to register for the Draft, but a mother in New Jersey actually sued on behalf of her high-school graduating daughter to change it. "In 2013 the U.S. Department of Defense announced the end of the direct ground combat exclusion rule for female service members."
The mother stated her daughter was not so much an activist as she was interested in fairness, stating she sure would never have done it. Her daughter did not voluntarily enroll in the military after her graduation either but went off to college to be a vet. We are left with understanding there is a "pretended" equality sought by the majority of women most thinking about wages, and a very small minority willing to put their life on the line in real Equality eradicating the borders of the sexes.
Ask any male how he felt when he was 18 years old, (maybe except Barack Obama based on the abnormalities of hisdraft registration reported by a law enforcement investigation and the passport break conducted three times by , let's leave the three letter dirty words out of this, and simply refer to John O. Brennan who was then a CEO of Analysis Corp, big contributor to Barack Obama Candidacy, and now heads the CIA not protecting his former employee very well as a witness of the break-in as he was shot in the head sitting out in his car in front of a church ) when he was filling out his Draft Registration Form, about the seriousness of never knowing after that day what day his Country might call him out and put him on a very serous front line of a barraging assaults?
More importantly ask yourself if your a female between the ages of 18-25, maybe even 30, especially if your single or divorced if you'd respect your Country more for sending you out on the battlefield based on "equality" or if you might feel a little humiliated- traumatized- even tortured by understanding what Hillary Clinton had brought to your world, that she never ever had to face her entire life?
|Muammar Gaddafi Libya Primary Leader|
After you ask that question Millennials might understand the WOMEN AGAINST HILLARY Movement happening all across America now.
While Hillary Clinton was Senator Clinton, she never cared about equality in sponsoring legislation that would equalize the Draft Registration among sex, but of course she is very enthusiastic amount being Commander-In-Chief and sitting in that luxurious red seat conducting WARS, watching and laughing about it as she did about the unauthorized war toppling Libya'sMuammar Gaddafi which now has become the breeding ground for ISIS.
The seriousness of Hillary Clinton becoming Commander-In-Chief and almost single highhandedly bringing every little girl in America in a new nightmare and fear of being killed or maimed in war is much more real than the insecurity, and discomfort of a hymen test.
Who can forget the unsavory 12 second reaction caught of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in her contempt of a Nations Leader of over 40 years "We Came, We Saw, He Died" and then laughing ridiculously? Even amongst enemies respect must be shown and that respect is translated to entire populations. This is something especially well known and understood by men perhaps based on the blanket of blood provided in the Defense of this Nation and is never something to be gloated over.
It is a very serious matter and the offense of gloating over a win is an unrestrained emphasis of bad behavior or shrill not to tolerated amongst the bravest warriors or made light of in contempt of courage by troops. I wouldn't tolerate it as President.
THE RISKS OF A DRAFT for WOMEN 18-30
The United States is already on a very real course of collision with Powers that are not fooling around or laughing at the seriousness of stability for great populations and civilizations with the economy and security concerns of Nations that much of the peace in the world may very well be jeopardized with in the near future.
Hillary Clinton even as a Candidate for President has already called for essentially what would be a collision course with Russia calling for a no-fly zone in Syria that would undoubtedly conflict with Russia's Air Force staging effective sortie. Obama even called the misdiagnosis a hiccup by Clinton spurred by "political motivation"much like her narrative to the General Public differed in the Benghazi Terrorism attacks linked with her tenure as Secretary of State on 911 and the information related to other heads of states as nothing to do with a video tape which we all learned from the release of her emails in the latest Benghazi hearings was politically motivated.
What this translates into or means is that Hillary Clinton will do anything and everything to hide, conceal, and distort the very real ramifications of what she has used to propel her politically upward. Once she is there, our Nation could face a real crisis of Reality to the Equality Question. Hillary has demonstrated a sever distortion of judgement in many and repeated instances when it comes to our Nations security. When will the 19-25 year old women feel "Hillary's equality" and wish to God they had never voted for her? It is much more likely that they will feel it on the Battle Fields of War then in their Purse over a wage equality.
That day might be the day they are called to register for the Draft under Hillary Clinton who decides that WWIII is a casualty she wishes on her Report Card and that she won't be around as President to have to explain anyway, as millions of our little girls are brought home in caskets or are maimed beyond recognition with their face crushed, their arms and legs blown off in the direct FORCE of EQUALITY?
How do you like Hillary Clinton now? How is the equality working out for you in the seriousness of your vote in the coming 2016 Democratic Party Nominating process Iowa, New Hampshire, and even the General Election if Hillary gets the nodd from the Democratic Party?
My own feeling is that I am losing as a Democratic Party Presidential Candidate. Hillary Clinton leads followed bySenator Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Governor Martin O' Malley. The call for a women to be President is not something that I would not applaud under the right circumstances in our future, but it is not Today to someone who has skirted in her legislative applications, and danced away her National Security collateral in so many instances including not supporting the Constitution's demand for a [natural born Citizen] ie born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents in the Office of the President as I have spent the last seven years fighting for.
Democrats since 2008 have been on a downward spiral unparalleled in the political races of our Country. It is not even stretch of anyone's imagination.
|The REAL DANGER of voting for someone based|
on a physical description or outward appearance or
characteristic instead of the Heart or what's inside
The Republicans have ridden Barrack Obama like a horse about as far into the sand as they could possibly ride him while the Democratic Party has kept its head in the sand about anything that pertained to Barack Obama's ineligibility.
It might be that Obama has been protected, but at what cost?
And at what cost will our children pay for the misguided, misidentified, misfortunes, and miscalculations of those who have aligned themselves by pretended circumstances of pity, support, and government dependency?
America is in Crisis. We have got to get her back on track, and while I'm running for President and many think it has just been because Obama was not eligible following my hard work in the some 14 Cases across the Country including 2 United States Supreme Court Cases, my greatest concern, is our children and the future that they will face.
We all are indeed little children inside. I'm still a little boy inside holding the door open for my sister and being considerate for girls. If being a gentlemen has become so foreign in the United States that we all cannot recall why our girls haven't been required to sign up for a Draft in a hot war, then I'm very much afraid the reasons preventing such are also disappearing and we all will learn first hand.
As for my recommendation I do not think things should be equal accept for the opportunity. We should not Draft our little girls. It should be a voluntary enlistment that is held in a very high criteria. That criteria that I would consider would include the willingness of any recruited voluntary female soldier to willingly use sex as a defense for any of her male soldier counterparts in the field of danger or to necessitate their release or capture. That might be a little different then Jakarta's because of the use and dedication of her entire body no different then would be expected from any male counterpart.
That would meet a significant standard of equality in the field in my consideration. Those unwilling to meet that standard I would not consider willing to give all as their male counter parts are.
Like it, share it, support it, and follow us on the sites below