π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
TO HIS FACE! Mayor Of Disappearing Island Shuts Down Al Gore’s Global Warming Claim
Gore Blames Climate Change For EVERYTHING! Ocean-Going Mayor Calls Him Out!
Mayor James “Ooker” Eskridge challenged former Vice President Al Gore on his claim that sea levels were rising in Chesapeake Bay because of global climate change. “I Just Don’t See It.”
Mayor Of Disappearing Island Faces Al Gore And Shuts Down Global Warming Claim
According to theblaze.com, James “Ooker” Eskridge is the mayor of a town on an island disappearing in Chesapeake Bay, but rather than see it as evidence of global warming, he used it to shut down Al Gore’s narrative that the seas are rising because of climate change.
Eskridge faced the climate warming alarmist during a CNN town hall on global warming.
“I’m a commercial crabber,” Eskridge said, “and I’ve been working the Chesapeake Bay for 50-plus years. And I have a crab house business out on the water. And water level is the same as it was when the place was built in 1970.”
“I’m not a scientist but I’m a keen observer, and if sea level rises are occurring,” he asked, “why am I not seeing signs of it?”
“Our island is disappearing,” he explained, “but it’s because of erosion and not because of sea level rising, unless we get a seawall, we will lose our island.”
“But, back to the question,” he said, “why am I not seeing signs of the sea level rising?”
“What do you think the erosion is due to, mayor?” Gore asked.
“Wave action, storms,” he responded.
“Has that increased, any?” Gore asked.
“Not really,” Eskridge said.
“So you’re losing the island even though the waves haven’t increased,” Gore said.
“Yes,” Eskridge replied, “this erosion has been going on since Captain John Smith discovered the island.”
“Well, arguments about science aren’t necessarily going to be any comfort to you and I’m sorry for what you’re going through,” Gore said.
“It won’t necessarily do you any good for me to tell you that the scientists do say that the sea level is rising in the Chesapeake Bay,” he continued, “and that you’ve lost about two-thirds of your island already, over a longer period of time. And the forecast for the future is another two feet of sea — if there was another two feet of sea level rise, what would that mean for Tangier Island?”
“Tangier Island, our elevation is only about 4 feet above level,” Eskridge said, “and if I see sea level rise occurring, I’ll shout it from the housetops, we don’t have, you know, the land to give up.”
“But I’m just not seeing it,” he said.
Eskridge’s plight to save his island reached mainstream media attention when President Donald Trump called him after seeing a CNN report about the disappearing island’s Trump-supporting mayor. Trump reportedly told him to not worry about his island and that it would be there for many hundreds of years more. It wasn’t clear if he addressed the seawall construction to save the island.
Gore is currently making the rounds to publicize the sequel to his global climate documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth.” Recently, he said that the global warming fight was in the same vein as great “moral causes” of humanity in the past, like the Civil Rights cause of the ’60s, and abolition.”
Source:>>>>>>Here
π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
The View’s Joy Behar CRUSHED By Donald Rumsfeld After She Trashes Trump [VIDEO]
Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was able to completely crush Joy Behar in just two words. He went onto ‘The View’ where the hosts started talking about the election results. Even though the election was over 6 months ago, liberals still can’t get over it.
“Well he lost by more than three million votes in the popular vote. He won the electoral vote,” argued Behar. Rumsfeld shot her back in two words. “What counts?” he asked. “Well the electoral vote counts,” said Behar. “I thought so,” responded Rumsfeld.
Source:>>>>>>>HereThe other View hosts then brought up the alleged collusion between President Trump’s campaign and Russia. They compare it to Watergate. Rumsfeld crushed them for their stupidity.“I think suggesting that we are at a point that approximates Watergate I think is a stretch. Why do you want to engage in hypotheticals? This man was elected president of the United States. There is an investigation on the subject you’ve cited. Which is perfectly appropriate. Nothing has been concluded. I have a sense you might be jumping to conclusions,” said Rumsfeld.He is completely right. Are you tired of the liberal narrative that President Trump isn’t legitimate? America wanted President Trump and they are all in denial.
π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
JUST RELEASED: New Clinton-Abedin Emails Reveal Illegal Activity
The government watchdog group Judicial Watch has released a group of previously undisclosed Hillary Clinton emails from her time as Secretary of State.
The new emails reveal that Clinton aide Huma Abedin sent top secret information over unsecured networks and that Clinton Foundation donors received “special treatment” from the US State Department.
According to Judicial Watch’s website, 1,606 document pages were released Wednesday, “containing emails from the unsecured, non-government account of Huma Abedin, Clinton’s then-deputy chief of staff, also show Clinton or her staff expressing interest in visiting Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez and North Korean dictator Kim Jung II.”
Judicial Watch reveals:
The documents were obtained in response to a court order from a May 5, 2015, lawsuit filed against the State Department (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)) after it failed to respond to a March 18, 2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking: “All emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-‘state.gov’ email address.”Several emails contain classified information.On March 12, 2009, Sid Blumenthal, former aide to Bill Clinton and confidant of Hillary Clinton, sent Mrs. Clinton a memo about Northern Ireland that was classified CONFIDENTIAL and the details were withheld from release under FOIA Exemption B1.4(D) (dealing with foreign relations or foreign activities).On February 27, 2009, Ambassador Melanne Verveer sent Clinton a briefing memo/email on discussions she held with Congolese officials, which was classified as CONFIDENTIAL and withheld under FOIA exemption B1.4(D).On January 22, 2010, Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan sent an email about a call to Chinese Foreign Minister Yang to several State Department officials. It contained information classified as CONFIDENTIAL by State and exempted under FOIA Exemption B1.4(D). It was forwarded to Abedin’s unsecure email account. The email had an attached memorandum of the Clinton-Yang call. State Department official Courtney Beale subsequently tells Assistant Secretary Todd Stern that she had sent that memo previously to him on the “high side” [i.e., via secure email channels].On August 20, 2010, State Department official Laura Lucas sent to Abedin’s unclassified email account a call sheet for Clinton with Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Moratinos, which contained classified CONFIDENTIAL information that was withheld based on B1.4(D).
There’s still more proof of illegal activity that shouldn’t be laughed off by even the most devout supporters of Hillary Clinton. If you weren’t convinced before, these documents prove once and for all Hillary’s criminal activity while serving as Secretary of State.
Fox News reports:
Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton says newly-released emails show Huma Abedin sending classified information over unsecured networks and Clinton Foundation donors potentially receiving special treatment from the State Department.Fitton said Abedin was regularly receiving the emails – including from the then-secretary of state – over Hillary Clinton’s illicit private server.[…] Fitton said if this conduct involved an average person, he or she would have been subject to prosecution for handling classified information in this manner.“Losing an election ought not to be a get-out-of-jail-free card,” Fitton told Tucker Carlson.On “Fox & Friends,” Judge Andrew Napolitano agreed that “justice should be done” based on the law and the evidence.
Remember that the statute of limitations on Hillary has not yet run out. The Justice Department could very well build a case if they so choose.
What’s more is that the documents also contain information that suggest, as Fox News’ senior judicial analyst said, “a pattern of Clinton Foundation donors receiving favors from the State Department.”
That had never been investigated by the FBI.
Anyone with the guts to treat real evidence with the seriousness it deserves would recognize this as a crime, and just being Hillary Clinton doesn’t change that. Source:>>>>>>>Here
π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
"FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY"
NEVER FORGET THE SACRIFICES
BY OUR VETERANS Note: We at Friends of Liberty cannot make any warranties about the completeness, reliability and accuracy of this information.
Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter , Tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
Friends of Liberty is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to Educate, protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.
WE THE PEOPLE
TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Join The Resistance and Share This Article Now!
‼️️ 
♻️ PLEASE SHARE ♻️ ‼️️
Share this story on Facebook and let us know because we want to hear YOUR voice!
No comments:
Post a Comment