1.the offense of acting to overthrow one's government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2.a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.
3.the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.
The American Declaration of Independence tells us Sovereignty
You cannot even comprehend the amount of voter's fraud that goes on we all know that it happens but to what extent you might ask? Or your one of those that say see no matter what my vote won't make a difference well your wrong and I hope that I can show you that your vote can turn this around. Until I started checking I would have never imagined it went as far or the amount of laws people we're willing to break just to get someone elected and no where is this done more than in the Democratic party.You have campaign managers committing fraud non-citizen voting and yes this was never more rampant than in the last Presidential election there's no doubt in my mind now because of how close some of the races were that because of non-citizen voters and Democratic fraud this the very reason we ended up with Barack Hussein Obama as our 44th President of the United States.
Non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) won election in 2008 with a victory margin of 312 votes. Votes cast by just 0.65 percent of Minnesota non-citizens could account for this margin. It is also possible that non-citizen votes were responsible for Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina. Obama won the state by 14,177 votes, so a turnout by 5.1 percent of North Carolina’s adult non-citizens would have provided this victory margin.
People have this belief that a non-citizens will not register for fear of getting caught and sent back to their Country or for any number of reasons but think about it your in the Country of your dreams and you hear this politician and he is saying and telling you everything you wanted to hear in your own country but never did then your in America and you have a man like Barack Hussein Obama telling you all the things you always wanted to hear and you think to yourself oh I could bring my family here and we could live the life we have always wanted now tell me you wouldn't go register? Well when your only asked to show you have a household bill to get a voter's registration card in some places imagine how many other places drop the ball on the requirements'. Three States Oregon, Washington, and now Colorado run all their elections by mail.In New Jersey a voter may apply to vote by mail for any reason or no reason at all. And out of all of those states none are as corrupt as Colorado as you will see in video below. And to those who don't or won't see this I will say this Voting Fraud Is Treason.
1.the offense of acting to overthrow one's government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2.a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.3.the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery. They all apply one way or another they actually all fit voting fraud and most Democrat's.
PLEASE WATCH VIDEO PROOF OF SHOCKING VOTER FRAUD!
2.a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.3.the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery. They all apply one way or another they actually all fit voting fraud and most Democrat's.
PLEASE WATCH VIDEO PROOF OF SHOCKING VOTER FRAUD!
Do Not Give Them The Power Get Out And Vote!
There is power in the numbers!
Starting in 2006 , a group of 39 Universities came together to create the CCES also know as Cooperative Congressional Election Study the first truly large-scale academic survey project aimed at studying the mid-term congressional elections. The study has continued every year thereafter and continues to involve teams of researcher's from across the country. Their joint efforts have produced National Sample Surveys in every Federal Election since, including 55,000 person samples in 2010 and 2012.And these are their findings reported by The Washington Post.
Could control of the Senate in 2014 be decided by illegal votes cast by non-citizens? Some argue that incidents of voting by non-citizens are so rare as to be inconsequential, with efforts to block fraud a screen for an agenda to prevent poor and minority voters from exercising the franchise, while others define such incidents as a threat to democracy itself. Both sides depend more heavily on anecdotes than data. Okay now here is where I have a really big problem it's with the word "Inconsequential" meaning of little or no importance; insignificant; trivial. Now for those that think that the number of non-citizen votes are so small that the wouldn't effect the election it's ridiculous we are told that every vote counts in order to drive us to vote so if a few non-citizens vote's don't count then why should we believe our own vote counts?
In an article in the journal Electoral Studies data from big social science surveys will show to what extent non-citizen voting can bear on close electoral races.
Using the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) as a source. Its large number of observations (32,800 in 2008 and 55,400 in 2010) provide sufficient samples of the non-immigrant sub-population, with 339 non-citizen respondents in 2008 and 489 in 2010. For the 2008 CCES, we also attempted to match respondents to voter files so that we could verify whether they actually voted.14 percent of non-citizens in both 2008 and 2010 were registered to vote and by all indications most of these non-citizens did vote. Based on the samples with verified vote, is that 6.4 % of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 % of non-citizens voted in 2010. Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample) I don't know about you but that's kind of a big deal to me isn't it?
Using the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) as a source. Its large number of observations (32,800 in 2008 and 55,400 in 2010) provide sufficient samples of the non-immigrant sub-population, with 339 non-citizen respondents in 2008 and 489 in 2010. For the 2008 CCES, we also attempted to match respondents to voter files so that we could verify whether they actually voted.14 percent of non-citizens in both 2008 and 2010 were registered to vote and by all indications most of these non-citizens did vote. Based on the samples with verified vote, is that 6.4 % of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 % of non-citizens voted in 2010. Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample) I don't know about you but that's kind of a big deal to me isn't it?
.
Since we have now thrown North Carolina in there this should be brought up because of the close Senate race there. With the North Carolina U.S. Senate race in a dead heat, state election officials say they have discovered 145 names on the voting rolls who are ineligible to vote because they are illegal immigrants who have been granted President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals status.
In North Carolina nearly 10,000 names on the rolls are tagged by the DMV as "legally present," according to elections and transportation officials. But that doesn’t mean that all 10,000 are ineligible to vote at this time. These are license holders who were not U.S. citizens when they got a license. They may have been green-card holders, foreign workers or foreign students, for example.
Most have become U.S. citizens since getting a license, according to an estimate by elections officials based on a sample of the overall list.
According to the report, earlier this month the SBOE officials did a sample cross-check of 1,600 of the 10,000 “legally present” names against a Department of Homeland Security database and found that 94 percent were U.S. citizens and eligible to vote. However, that still meant that six percent were ineligible, meaning if the ratio held for the whole 10,000, 600 people would be ineligible.
Mike Charbonneau, a DMV spokesman, told the Journal that it is now cross checking all the names.
While the officials work to cross check names, early voting is set to start in the state Thursday.
“We want to know how such a large number of non-U.S. citizens were ever registered to vote in the first place,” Jay DeLancy, executive director of the Voter Integrity Project of North Carolina, told Watchdog.org. “There is clearly a system failure here and we need the Board of Elections and the DMV to help the Legislature and the public understand where the problem lies.”
This is just how easy it is to vote non-citizen
Voter fraud is REAL people WAKE UP!
No comments:
Post a Comment