I'm surprised N.J. Governor Chris Christie
didn't sign a bill giving Anthony Weiner, the disgraced former New York
Congressman and mayoral candidate, free zones to show that portion of his
anatomy he is so eager to share on social sites. Christie removed any doubt, as
if there really were any, about just what kind of so-called Republican he
is.
He signed a law yesterday that bars licensed therapists from trying to turn homosexual teenagers away from a lifestyle of disease and emotional illness to one of normality (called the Gay conversion recovery ban). And just like his best buddy Obama who, when he was a legislator in Chicago, viciously fought the "Born Alive Infant Protection Act" claiming the measure didn't include the "life and health of the mother" provision -- (as if a baby who survives a failed abortion attempt and is outside of the womb poses any threat to its mother, but I digress), Christie feigned sadness over having to sign the ban while he claimed the health risks were just too great to a child. And he cited a laughable study by the American Psychological Association which I would bet was compiled by a group of homosexuals and/or their sympathizers.
Last week, though, Christie kicked childhood health concerns to the curb when he signed into law legislation that allowed marijuana growers to create an edible form for chronically ill children.
When it came to banning therapy that has been successful in turning children from a destructive lifestyle of homosexuality, Christie claimed on "issues of medical treatment for children we must look to experts in the field to determine the relative risks and rewards." Just as he had done in 2011 with Piers Morgan, Christie put on his Pontiff's hat and claimed homosexuality is not a sin and that homosexuals are born that way (which contradicts the teaching of his church). I'm sure my late cousin who became a homosexual after being repeatedly raped by an older male family member would be interested in that debate. Especially since he passed away from AIDS. That said, it's too bad for Christie that God doesn't view things quite the same way he does.
But I'm sure the homosexual lobby is celebrating because Christie's action puts them one step closer to making it a hate crime to oppose their debaucherous chosen lifestyle.
I've got one word regarding Christie: "Make sure the lard bucket liberal doesn't win another election." And, for those who will hasten to point out that's more than one word, let me hasten to point out that it's as much one word as "protecting children from lives of disease and emotional instability" is bad for them.
He signed a law yesterday that bars licensed therapists from trying to turn homosexual teenagers away from a lifestyle of disease and emotional illness to one of normality (called the Gay conversion recovery ban). And just like his best buddy Obama who, when he was a legislator in Chicago, viciously fought the "Born Alive Infant Protection Act" claiming the measure didn't include the "life and health of the mother" provision -- (as if a baby who survives a failed abortion attempt and is outside of the womb poses any threat to its mother, but I digress), Christie feigned sadness over having to sign the ban while he claimed the health risks were just too great to a child. And he cited a laughable study by the American Psychological Association which I would bet was compiled by a group of homosexuals and/or their sympathizers.
Last week, though, Christie kicked childhood health concerns to the curb when he signed into law legislation that allowed marijuana growers to create an edible form for chronically ill children.
When it came to banning therapy that has been successful in turning children from a destructive lifestyle of homosexuality, Christie claimed on "issues of medical treatment for children we must look to experts in the field to determine the relative risks and rewards." Just as he had done in 2011 with Piers Morgan, Christie put on his Pontiff's hat and claimed homosexuality is not a sin and that homosexuals are born that way (which contradicts the teaching of his church). I'm sure my late cousin who became a homosexual after being repeatedly raped by an older male family member would be interested in that debate. Especially since he passed away from AIDS. That said, it's too bad for Christie that God doesn't view things quite the same way he does.
But I'm sure the homosexual lobby is celebrating because Christie's action puts them one step closer to making it a hate crime to oppose their debaucherous chosen lifestyle.
I've got one word regarding Christie: "Make sure the lard bucket liberal doesn't win another election." And, for those who will hasten to point out that's more than one word, let me hasten to point out that it's as much one word as "protecting children from lives of disease and emotional instability" is bad for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment