I wrote about the George Zimmerman trial here, noting that so far, the trial seemed to have gone badly for the prosecution. I also said:
Continue Reading ........................>>I confess that I find much of the commentary on the Zimmerman case, and even a good bit of the evidence, mystifying. There is no question that Zimmerman shot Martin; he claims self-defense. That defense raises a straightforward question of fact. All of the nonsense about whether Zimmerman was a “wannabe cop,” and whether he “profiled” Martin, and whether he was or was not a “racist,” is utterly beside the point.
No comments:
Post a Comment