Yesterday, Liberty News reported that Ohio’s Secretary of State, John Husted, sent a letter to Eric Holder, addressing severe problems with his state’s out of date voter rolls, which Human Events observed could have resulted in one in every five voters in that pivotal state being potentially fraudulent.
Today, we will take a closer look at how and why the Holder Department of Justice is still stopping Ohio’s Conservative Chief Election Officer from doing his job and eliminating voter fraud in the Buckeye State.
The Ohio Secretary of State’s website confirms that the state’s theoretical elections buck should stop with him: “The Elections Division of the Secretary of State’s office also compiles and maintains election statistics, political party records and other election-related records.”
Yet, in reality, it seems like Ohio’s Tenth Amendment rights have been trampled by the federal government, since apparently, the real Chief Elections Officer in Ohio is actually Eric Holder!
During the 2012 election, John Husted tried to do and his job and purge the voter records maintained by his office of fraudulent voter IDs, including removing the names of deceased citizens, convicted felons who are ineligible to vote, and the names of people who have simply moved away.Husted sent a letter to Attorney General Holdernine months before the 2012 election saying:
“As Ohio’s chief elections official, it is my responsibility to ensure the votes of every eligible voter are counted and ensure the integrity and accuracy of the results. This is a difficult task when federal regulations limit Ohio’s ability to remove ineligible names, thereby increasing the chance for voter fraud.”
The federal regulations Mr. Husted is speaking of are the incumbent Attorney General’s interpretation of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Voter Registration Act, which are laws that protect the civil rights of minorities in particular.
Secretary Husted’s letter even included Ohio’s 2010 Census data for Holder to compare with the voter registration records, which Husted also gave to Holder, so that he could see the potential for widespread voter fraud on Election Day for himself.
Holder never replied to Husted’s request for a face-to face meeting or a letter of his own.
It could be argued that what Holder did next was wage war against the Tenth Amendment in Ohio, using these fraudulent entries as a means of statewide affirmative action.Using taxpayer dollars, the DOJ deployed “election monitors” to polling precincts and various election districts across Ohio before, during, and after the election to “ensure minority voting rights were being upheld.” The DOJ website lists pages of announcements of such activity by its agents.
The DOJ even began filing lawsuits against individual Ohio municipalities whose local election regulations could be seen, through a liberal lens, to place economic and racial minorities, who tend to vote more in-line with Team Obama, at a disadvantage in the process.
Want an example of such a heinous abuse which required the DOJ to “rescue” the disenfranchised? The City Council of Euclid, OH had been electing representatives in an at-large manner. Holder’s DOJ thought that the city should be using a more geographic-sensitive means of electing council members so that each district would be represented by a true peer. So, the DOJ’S Civil Rights Division filed a federal lawsuit against the City Council for discrimination.
It could be said that while Mr. Husted is bound in the chains of unnecessary federal litigation designed to use voter fraud as a means of affirmative action, the Ohio Secretary of State is still unable to do his job for OH.Not only does Holder’s extreme judicial activism make Ohio suffer, but, until this situation gets fixed; the rest of America will continue to see federal elections pivot on a state’s elections where twenty-five percent of the electorate is a federally sanctioned fraud.
No comments:
Post a Comment