January 4, 2013
If Barack Obama and his gaggle of
gun grabbers have their way, the American citizenry will have all of their
firearms taken away. If their current attempt to outlaw semi-automatic rifles is
successful, does anyone think it will stop there? Don’t be naïve! The goal of
people like Barack Obama, Dianne Feinstein, Charles Schumer, et al., has always
been total gun confiscation. In fact, Senator Feinstein is actually on record as
saying so.
According to
Infowars.com, “Senator Dianne Feinstein’s ultimate plan has always been to have
Mr. and Mrs. America turn in their guns to the government, period. Feinstein’s
bill would criminalize millions of Americans and completely eviscerate second
amendment rights.
“She tells us
a gun ban is about saving the children and reducing crime, but her comments on
60 Minutes in 1995 reveal her true plan is to target law-abiding American gun
owners.
“On Thursday,
Feinstein will introduce her dream bill to disarm the American people. The
legislation is open-ended and includes provisions to re-register firearms and
submit the fingerprints of law-abiding Americans as if they’re sex
offenders.
“Feinstein’s
bill will also include a buy-back provision that will allow the government to
confiscate all firearms. Both Feinstein and New York governor Andrew Cuomo have
said that is their plan.
“It is a gun
confiscation bill.
“The proposed
bill is open declaration of war on the Second Amendment.
“It’s no
coincidence that the communist Chinese, the biggest holders of U.S. debt, have
demanded the American people be disarmed. History tells us that it is the
instinct of all tyrants to disarm the slaves.”
The report
plays a video in which Senator Feinstein said, “If I could have gotten 51 votes
in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up [every gun]…
Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in.”
See the report here.
Writing for
the National Association for Gun Rights, Dudley Brown said, “After reading
Senator Dianne Feinstein’s new so-called ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban, I can only
describe it as the effective END of the Second Amendment in America.
“The
definition of an ‘Assault Weapon’ in this bill is so broad you can drive a truck
through it! They’re targeting EVERYTHING--rifles, shotguns and even
handguns.
“You see, the
gun-grabbers are going for broke.
“Even owners
of supposedly ‘grandfathered’ firearms will be treated like common
criminals.
“If passed,
Feinstein’s so-called ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban would:
“--Ban the
sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of 120 specifically named rifles,
shotguns and handguns;
“--Ban the
sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of ALL firearms with a detachable
magazine and at least one ‘military characteristic’--which could mean just about
anything that makes a gun ‘look scary.’
“--Bans the
sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of magazines holding more than 10
rounds;
“--Force
owners of ALL ‘grandfathered’ weapons to undergo an intrusive background check
and unnecessary fingerprinting;
“--Force
owners of ALL ‘grandfathered’ weapons to federally register their guns after
obtaining permission slip from local law enforcement showing their guns are not
in violation of state or local law. That’s right. If you own a $10 magazine
that’s more than 10 rounds, you’ll have to register it with the BATFE in their
National Firearms Registry.
“And you and I
both know registration is only the first step toward outright confiscation. So
don’t be fooled.”
See the report here.
As I stated in
this column last week, “The semi-automatic rifle is the vanguard of our liberty;
it is the surest and most trustworthy means of our self-defense; and it is the
primary companion of any man who would both protect and feed his
family.
“Make no
mistake about it: to take away an American’s right to a semi-automatic rifle is
to FULLY DISARM HIM. There is no Second Amendment; there is no right to keep and
bear arms; there is no citizen militia; there is no liberty without the
semi-automatic rifle!”
In that column
I also quoted Thomas Jefferson who rightly observed, “The strongest reason for
the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to
protect themselves against tyranny in government.”
See my column
here.
And it is
Jefferson’s observation that the “strongest reason” that the American people
must always retain the right to keep and bear arms is “to protect themselves
against tyranny in government,” that is universally ignored in the modern
gun-control debate.
Throughout the
United States, there are tens of millions of fully-armed citizens who are more
than capable of defending themselves and their communities against any
enemy--whether that enemy is an internal or external one. In fact, many millions
of these citizens have been trained in the US
armed forces. Firearms--especially semi-automatic rifles--in the hands of millions of American citizens is truly the only thing that stands between freedom and tyranny for the people of the United States. That Barack Obama and Dianne Feinstein want to disarm the American people should be considered an act of war against our liberties! In other words, ladies and gentlemen, this is a line in the sand that none of us can afford to ignore.
armed forces. Firearms--especially semi-automatic rifles--in the hands of millions of American citizens is truly the only thing that stands between freedom and tyranny for the people of the United States. That Barack Obama and Dianne Feinstein want to disarm the American people should be considered an act of war against our liberties! In other words, ladies and gentlemen, this is a line in the sand that none of us can afford to ignore.
Here’s how we
must fight:
1. We must
literally inundate our US representatives and senators with the most vociferous
protest.
We must make
sure that every representative and senator in America is told that under no
uncertain terms their reelection will be determined by how they vote on this
issue. Obviously, people such as Senators Feinstein and Schumer come from
liberal, anti-gun states--which is why they feel safe in proposing these
draconian gun-control measures. However, the vast majority of US House members
represent average God-fearing Americans to whom the right to keep and bear arms
is sacrosanct. And make no mistake about it: the legislative battle will be won
or lost in the US House of Representatives.
Here in
Montana, however, our two US senators (both Democrats) proudly profess to be
pro-Second Amendment. Montanans should be sending a strong message to both of
these senators to hold the line for our right to keep and bear arms--including
semi-automatic rifles. I cannot imagine that any civil magistrate from either
major political party could hope to be reelected in the State of Montana who
would support Senator Feinstein’s gun-grab bill. And I would hope and pray that
there would be dozens of other states in which the Second Amendment is equally
honored.
Folks, CALL
YOUR REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS NOW! If we expect to retain any semblance of
freedom for our posterity, we must pick up the phones and barrage our
representatives and senators with opposition to this gun-control bill. And we
must do it NOW! Furthermore, we must let our elected officials know that under
no uncertain terms there can be NO COMPROMISE, that only outright opposition to
any new gun-control measures will be deemed acceptable. There are already far
too many gun-control laws in this country. We cannot accept any more
abridgements and restrictions to our right to keep and bear arms. NO
MORE!
2. We must demand
of our State governors and legislators that they resist any attempts of the
federal government to outlaw our firearms.
Should the
Republican-led House of Representatives in Washington, D.C., cave-in to the
Obama gun-grab like they did on Obama’s tax increases, it will be up to the
states to say NO! If there is a single issue for which individual, sovereign
states would be willing to defy the federal government
and protect the rights and liberties of their citizens, it will be this issue. If the states, and liberty-minded people of the states, do not stand as one on this issue, there is no issue for which they would stand. We either draw the line on this issue or our liberties are gone forever!
and protect the rights and liberties of their citizens, it will be this issue. If the states, and liberty-minded people of the states, do not stand as one on this issue, there is no issue for which they would stand. We either draw the line on this issue or our liberties are gone forever!
This means
State legislatures should pass laws defying the federal gun ban and protecting
the right of citizens to keep and bear arms within their states. Governors
should be willing to utilize State law enforcement agencies to protect their
citizens’ right to keep (and not register) their guns, and county sheriffs
should stiffen their backs and refuse to allow any federal police agency from
enforcing the gun ban. After all, the county sheriff is the highest law
enforcement authority in his or her county, trumping even federal law
enforcement officers.
3. Individual
citizens like you and I must be willing to draw our personal line in the sand on
this issue and refuse to comply with any law requiring us to register or
surrender our firearms--including our semi-automatic rifles.
Ladies and
gentlemen, whatever the consequences might be, and whatever anyone else does or
doesn’t do, I am prepared to become an outlaw over this issue! I don’t know how
to say it any plainer: I will not register my firearms, and I will not surrender
my firearms. Period. End of story. It’s not just a saying with me: when my guns
are outlawed, I will be an outlaw!
It is time
RIGHT NOW for every American citizen to make up his or her mind on this
issue.
There are many
laws, which I personally find repugnant and even unconstitutional, to which I
grudgingly submit. For example, while I very much understand, and even
philosophically agree with, those who refuse to pay income taxes, I pay income
taxes. Even though I believe the income tax to be unconstitutional, onerous, and
maybe even nefarious, I have not drawn my line in the sand on that issue. I
haven’t drawn a line in the sand on the requirement for all sorts of government
licenses, i.e., marriage licenses, driver’s licenses, CCW permits, Social
Security cards, etc., even though I personally believe that many requirements
for licensure stretch the boundaries of legitimate government. And, again, even
though I understand those who refuse to take them, I have a marriage license, a
driver’s license, a CCW permit, and a Social Security card. There are many
issues over which I am willing to be annoyed, but for the sake of perceived
Christian testimony and/or perceived good citizenship, I reluctantly and
grudgingly comply. But on the issue of taking away my right to keep and bear
arms--including a semi-automatic rifle--I absolutely refuse to comply!

No comments:
Post a Comment