From Conception...To Election
"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptable doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson
OBAMA’S INELIGIBILITY MAKES POLICIES IRRELEVANT…NOT EVIDENCE OF FORGERY
WRONG QUESTION: Regardless of
transient political ideologies, confidence in a presidential candidate’s eligibility must be upheld unanimously
among all Americans as a preeminent
requirement before any legitimate debate over that president’s policies can be
possible. Any doubt, perceived or
material, which befalls the legal status of a candidate must be remedied by that
candidate to a degree which makes it impossible to undermine that candidate’s
identity, loyalty, eligibility and citizenship to hold that office,
whatsoever. Failure to secure this
foundation undermines the rule of law for all Americans and makes all laws
implemented under that president illegitimate while simultaneously breeding
revolution against anyone who serves in government. Barack Obama’s failure to demonstrate this
most basic and elementary quality ranks him with history’s most ridiculous and
heretical tricksters.
NEW YORK, NY – According to Nazi lie
master, Joseph Goebbels, the ingredients required for a recipe of tyranny and
violence are a political liar, an abettor and a compliant authority unwilling to
stop both.
Goebbels would have greatly
admired what the mainstream American media and the Judiciary branch of
government has become under the spell of Barack Obama today. Somewhere in the recesses of hell, as Fox
News, CNN, MSNBC, ABC and CBS all silently echo the disgraceful decisions by
judges presiding in eligibility challenges against Obama, the former head of
Nazi propaganda has a big smile on his face, celebrating a victory for the
crimes he modeled for government and media more than 70 years ago.
Beginning in 1933, Goebbels used
the media to hide the truth about the Third Reich’s murderous ambitions by
pushing the idea of ‘big government’ supremacy using a self-righteous
vilification of those who challenged the legitimacy of Hitler’s rule. Among them, just like those working at the
aforementioned broadcast networks, were those who upheld the false legitimacy of
a fraudulently appointed usurper by exploiting the subject of race and
accusations of criminality as incitements against their political enemies,
despite the fact that Hitler, too, was not a natural-born citizen of Germany.
In 2004, liberal propagandists
in the American media solidified themselves as renowned counterfeiters when they
conjured documents and used them as evidence during prime-time news reports to
promote unflattering lies about then GOP incumbent candidate, George W.
Bush. Seven people lost their career,
including veteran news anchor Dan Rather, while Bush was elected to a second
term.
However, the same liars returned
with a vengeance in 2008 undeterred in their vanity to exalt a usurper. Whereas the 2004 forgery was intended to
slander an opponent, this most recent episode of fraud was intended to help the
liberal establishment.
Certifi-gate began four years
ago. America was told by a bowing
liberal consensus with the help of a fawning, pro-Obama media that it was the
short-form rendition of Obama’s alleged birth record, referred to at that time
as a “Certification of Live Birth”, which was the only available documentation
of Obama’s “natural-born” citizenship and that we should all just accept it
without asking any questions.
That version of Obama’s birth
documentation was alleged to have been issued by the State of Hawaii in June
2008 yet was inexplicably stamped by the Hawaiian registrar’s office in
2007. The image of that document posted to the internet was
visibly altered (the certificate number was redacted), rendering it
invalid. Ignoring its lack of
authenticity, (the document had printed upon it by the agency that any
alteration, including redactions of the certificate number, renders it invalid),
it was also propped by organizations claiming nonpartisan objectivity, including
the Annenberg Foundation…which was revealed as a former employer of
Obama.
Liberal hacks in the media like
Chris “leg-tingle” Matthews and Keith “hate merchant” Olbermann then went on a
three year propaganda binge flapping a printed copy of the fake short-form COLB,
and their mouths, in front of the camera declaring the holy grail of Obama’s
eligibility to be president. Even
Hawaii’s Health Director, Chiyome Fukino, violated her jurisdiction and issued
two press releases declaring Obama’s natural-born status. No law under any jurisdiction gives legal
authority to a state Health Department to grant citizenship status, only the
Immigration and Naturalization Service has the capacity to do
this.
The “Certification of Live
Birth” was an experimental lie which
failed. Intended to be used to see how
much Obama could get away with, it deceived ignorant people for three
years. As demands for Obama’s original
documentation increased, Hawaii even tried to help Obama by discreetly changing
the header title of the state’s computer template from “Certification of Live
Birth” in 2010 to match the standard, 100-year-old U.S. Department of Health
paper document’s header, “CertifiCATE
of Live Birth”. It was an obvious
attempt to provide more document camouflage for Obama by causing confusion and
obscuring the farcical deficiencies of the Hawaiian short-form document by
equating it with federal authenticity.
Obama’s defenders are
sanctimonious, if not outright evil.
Fukino escaped to the state’s medical board, Olbermann has since been
fired, twice…and Matthews, along with
the remaining slew of defamatory media lechery, has less of “tingle” over Obama
after they were forced to see their pathetic failure as journalists.
In April, 2011, they would all
be forced to admit before the world that, actually, Obama had not yet provided
authentic documentation of his alleged “natural-born” identity and that the
short form image was a rank hoax.
27 lawsuits later, just as
Obama’s political image was being sufficiently damaged enough to warrant a new
and improved lie, Obama’s attorney, Judith Corley, scurried off to Hawaii on
April 25th, 2011, where she was allegedly pressed to sweet-talk an
inconvenienced Hawaiian municipality into digging up what the American public
was left to assume was the only digital copy of a 1961 birth certificate in
American history, presumably created in Adobe format 30 years before the
software even existed.
Then, Obama tried to make us
feel guilty for having the audacity to protect the integrity of our
Constitution…a Constitution which, by the way, he has expressed overt contempt
for over the past 30 years. We were told
we were subjecting Hawaii to arduous pains in asking municipal employees to
actually perform the duties of their tax-funded jobs. The poor Hawaiian agency’s vexation over
long-standing administrative rules, complex processes, limited resources…sweat
and tears, to provide this record was almost more than they could muster,
according to Obama.
We were told how unreasonable we
were being in our request to ensure the protection of America’s constitutional
sovereignty by having the audacity to actually demand that America’s first self-entitled president be eligible for
the office he sought. It was even
implied that we should consider ourselves privileged to be blessed with this
lone scrap of regal documentation and therefore should feel guilty about
doubting its veracity.
We learned soon after that
Hawaii had recently produced the same long-form documents for other applicants
during that same week without so much as a complaint.
Like a virus, multiple copies
were then reproduced on paper by the White House and used to infect the press,
while Obama’s media organ, NBC, appointed an overbender for Obama, Savannah
Guthrie, to physically inspect the allegedly certified-with-a-raised-seal paper
version of the document. Guthrie remains
the only individual on the planet, outside of Obama’s government, to have
witnessed this ghostly document.
“If the posse’s mind-blowing
findings are correct, what is it that Judith Corley couriered back to
Washington? And what is it that Savannah Guthrie touched?” asks WND’s Diana
West.
“I find such questions most
intriguing – even if the rest of the media do not – particularly after last
week’s court hearing into Obama’s eligibility to appear on the ballot in the New
Jersey presidential primary. After literally dozens of such eligibility cases
since 2008 (evidently, the media are waiting for a discernible story trend to
emerge before they pounce), I can report, having watched a video of the New
Jersey hearing
online, that the president’s team is making progress. Only now it’s away
from his long-form birth certificate.”
A digital image of the record
was posted to the WhiteHouse.gov website on April 27 to worshipped by all. It was endorsed as authentic by Obama and
former White House counsel, Robert Bauer, at a formal press briefing…just before
Bauer mysteriously resigned without explanation, perhaps as a result of his
realization of the level of deception being wrought by Obama.
This is the same Internet image,
along with an image of Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration card,
discovered by a constitutionally empowered law enforcement investigation group
to be forgeries. At a press conference
held on March 1, 2012, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office explained that it
believed the online image originated as a computer file and never even
existed in original paper form before being fabricated from multiple sources and
posted to the government website.
West goes on to write about the
recent New Jersey ballot challenge hearing in which Mr. Obama’s attorney,
Alexandra Hill, “couldn’t have been more adamant about not citing the online birth certificate
as a means of proving the president’s identity in this recent challenge – and
after everyone went to so much trouble to get it! Indeed, she called the
Internet image “legally irrelevant,” arguing that New Jersey law doesn’t
specifically call for a birth certificate to qualify a presidential candidate
for the ballot.”
As indicated by online video of
Hill’s arguments, she agreed with the plaintiffs “great arguments” that the
image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that,
therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born
citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on
the ballot”.
Hill went on to contort
reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not
legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate. During the hearing, Hill's bizarre argument
was showcased by the following exchange:
Judge Masin asked Hill, “I understand you have a general objection before we get to the question of what is his (Obama’s) qualifications?”
“Yes, I have an objection as to relevance,” replied Hill, as to the plaintiffs’ witness testimony regarding the authenticity of the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 'Certificate of Live Birth'.
“The objectors carry the burden of proof to show that a candidate is not eligible under New Jersey statutes. Photographs (of Obama’s alleged birth certificate) are not relevant as to the discussion of the law today,” said Hill.
Then, shockingly, Hill went on to agree with widely publicized suspicions that the image of Obama’s alleged Certificate of Live Birth is, indeed, a fabrication. She conceding that the plaintiffs’ arguments against the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate were valid saying, “I understand that they have great arguments (that the internet image of Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery), but I don’t see how that is relevant in this case.”
Hill’s misunderstanding of administrative law reveals a strategy to defend Obama’s fraudulent election in which our legal system has reversed the legal assignment of burden of proof in order to equate eligibility with a legal definition of innocence of a crime for Obama.
Unfortunately for Obama, eligibility for political office does not fall under the precepts of criminalogical reasoning of "innocent until proven guilty", unless a charge is made that a crime has been committed, such as forgery or fraud, in order to deceive people about your identity or citizenship status. Obama's ineligibility, by itself, is not a crime...being fraudulently elected by deceiving voters is.
Simply put, Obama does not have a right to hold an office he is not eligible for and, therefore, he is not harmed by a lawful denial of an opportunity to hold the office he is not eligible for. Therefore, it is incumbent upon Obama to prove he is eligible in order to avoid harming others by his illegitimate election. It is not the responsibility of those who are risk to show evidence that Obama is ineligible.
Hill incorrectly argued that Obama is automatically eligible until proven ineligible, yet she sought to suppress the very evidence which shows that Obama’s eligibility has never actually been proven to begin with.Hill then attempted to have the judge declare that Obama was preeminently eligible without any legal responsibility to prove with documentation that he was, in fact, qualified to hold the office of the presidency.
Judge Masin asked Hill, “I understand you have a general objection before we get to the question of what is his (Obama’s) qualifications?”
“Yes, I have an objection as to relevance,” replied Hill, as to the plaintiffs’ witness testimony regarding the authenticity of the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 'Certificate of Live Birth'.
“The objectors carry the burden of proof to show that a candidate is not eligible under New Jersey statutes. Photographs (of Obama’s alleged birth certificate) are not relevant as to the discussion of the law today,” said Hill.
Then, shockingly, Hill went on to agree with widely publicized suspicions that the image of Obama’s alleged Certificate of Live Birth is, indeed, a fabrication. She conceding that the plaintiffs’ arguments against the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate were valid saying, “I understand that they have great arguments (that the internet image of Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery), but I don’t see how that is relevant in this case.”
Hill’s misunderstanding of administrative law reveals a strategy to defend Obama’s fraudulent election in which our legal system has reversed the legal assignment of burden of proof in order to equate eligibility with a legal definition of innocence of a crime for Obama.
Unfortunately for Obama, eligibility for political office does not fall under the precepts of criminalogical reasoning of "innocent until proven guilty", unless a charge is made that a crime has been committed, such as forgery or fraud, in order to deceive people about your identity or citizenship status. Obama's ineligibility, by itself, is not a crime...being fraudulently elected by deceiving voters is.
Simply put, Obama does not have a right to hold an office he is not eligible for and, therefore, he is not harmed by a lawful denial of an opportunity to hold the office he is not eligible for. Therefore, it is incumbent upon Obama to prove he is eligible in order to avoid harming others by his illegitimate election. It is not the responsibility of those who are risk to show evidence that Obama is ineligible.
Hill incorrectly argued that Obama is automatically eligible until proven ineligible, yet she sought to suppress the very evidence which shows that Obama’s eligibility has never actually been proven to begin with.Hill then attempted to have the judge declare that Obama was preeminently eligible without any legal responsibility to prove with documentation that he was, in fact, qualified to hold the office of the presidency.
Absurdly, Obama’s position, as
contorted by Hill, is that his appearance on New Jersey's presidential ballot is
not related to his actual eligibility to be president.
West wrote, “Exactly how a presidential candidate
demonstrates he is at least 35 years old and “natural born,” the constitutional
requirement New Jersey upholds, Hill didn’t say, but Administrative Law Judge
Jeff Masin found her arguments persuasive to the point of preventing an expert
witness from offering testimony that the online image is a forgery.”
“Even though the Obama team
entered no documentation of the president’s identity into the record – not even
that “certified” birth document Obama’s personal lawyer traveled so far to
retrieve – Judge Masin managed to find that the president was both born in
Hawaii and “natural born.”
“Neat, huh? But note the shift
in legal tactics. If, in New Jersey, the online birth certificate was “legally
irrelevant,” in January’s Georgia eligibility hearing, the president’s lawyer,
Michael Jablonski, considered it legally decisive. Jablonski cited “the
documents evidencing the birth of President Obama” that are available online to
try to quash a subpoena that “commanded” Obama to come to court and bring “any
and all birth records” with him (among other documents).”
“A golden opportunity to show
off that certified, hand-couriered birth doc from Hawaii, and be done with it,
no? No. When Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi refused to quash the
subpoena, Jablonski and Obama ignored it. They just didn’t show up. Not to
worry: Flouted subpoena and all, and without any evidence from the Obama team,
Judge Malihi found that the president was both born in Hawaii and “natural
born,” too.”
“Amazing how that works, and no
matter what the president’s lawyers do – so long as they don’t enter tangible
evidence of the president’s identity into the court record.”
“As for that new birth
certificate that came online last April? Since government and media have
abdicated their responsibility to help determine whether it’s the real McCoy or
a forgery, what else is there to do but wish it a happy first
birthday?”
In other words, when the liar
tells his lie, use the national media to promote it as truth. Then, when
decent, honest citizens discover the lie and seek a redress of their greivances
, just have the legal system ignore them.
Before you know it, 10 million
people will be murdered and your usurpation of power will have violated every
inalienable right endowed by God upon humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment