A New Jersey Justice recently ruled that Ted Cruz is eligible to run for U.S. President.
The ruling, and all other similar rulings, contradict the meaning of natural-born-citizen as defined by the Naturalization Act of 1795. If this has been overturned, by all means tell us, but it has to be by a Legislative Act, and not by some Judicial opinion that contradicts established law. Not even Marbury v Madison sanctions that.
In 1790, natural-born status was given to children of citizens (plural, meaning both father and mother) even if the children were born abroad, but the 1795 Congress saw the need to change that, and natural-born status was taken away by the Naturalization Act of 1795. Was Ted Cruz naturalized when he was under 21? He applied for and received U.S. citizenship in 2014, when he was 44. And both parents still have to be citizens, so when did his father become a U.S. citizen? In 2005, when Ted was 35. Even if Ted meets those qualifications, all he qualifies for is citizen. The status of natural-born was explicitly denied by the Naturalization Act of 1795 to children of naturalized parents or children born outside of country.
Quoted from: United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” (March 26, 1790).
"And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed."
This was changed five years later.
Quoted from: United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform rule of Naturalization; and to repeal the act heretofore passed on that subject” (January 29, 1795).
SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, that the children of persons duly naturalized, dwelling within the United States, and being under the age of twenty-one years, at the time of such naturalization, and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident of the United States: Provided also, That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, or who has been legally convicted of having joined the army of Great Britain during the late war, shall be admitted a citizen as foresaid, without the consent of the legislature of the state, in which such person was proscribed.
Ted claims to be a natural-born citizen. Quoting from an old link, "Speaking to reporters in Iowa on Wednesday, the Texas senator said, “as a legal matter, the question is quite straightforward and settled law that the child of a U.S. citizen born abroad is a natural born citizen".”
Senator Cruz, according to the Constitution, you weren't even an ordinary citizen until 2014, and you never were a natural-born U.S. citizen. Either you don't know the Constitution or you use it to exploit citizens. Either way I don't want you as President. You're no more eligible than Barack Obama.
Ted's family timeline can be found in this link, and part of the commentary is quoted here:
"Because Ted Cruz has been confirmed a legal citizen of Canada up until renouncing his Canadian citizenship in May of 2014, and because he has been confirmed a citizen of Canada at birth, and because his father is on public record stating that he and his wife became citizens of Canada during their eight years living in Canada and because Rafael Cruz remained a citizen of Canada until he renounced and applied for legal US citizenship in 2005. There is simply NO WAY that Ted Cruz was, is or ever can be a Natural Born Citizen of the United States eligible for the offices of President or Vice President.
So, does this mean that members of the Tea Party are engaged in an overt effort to defraud Tea Party members who are Ted fans, by all of this legal fancy foot work.
The facts are all well documented. You decide...
One who inherits their Citizenship at birth via nature alone, from their natural birth father, is a natural born Citizen of the United States. According to all available information on Ted Cruz and his family, Ted Cruz was a native born citizen of Canada and not a natural born Citizen of the United States. Now, Ted is either not too bright, or not too honest... But he is at least one of the two... and what about the Tea Party leaders behind this legal shell game?"
Donald Trump is a natural-born-citizen, and so is Dr. Carson, and they're the only true grassroots candidates for 2016. Ted Cruz doesn't even qualify for the Cleveland convention. If you like this please share it. Trump & Carson 2016
I GUESS SINCE OBAMA GOT AWAY WITH BEING INELIGIBLE AND ELECTED BY IDIOTS, CRUZ THINKS HE CAN NOW DO THE SAME. MAKE SURE YOU SHARE THIS WITH ALL YOUR FRIENDS, FAMILY, CO-WORKERS, YOUR PEOPLE IN CONGRESS. IT IS TIME TO TAKE A STAND FOR OUR CONSTITUTION...NOBODY ELSE SEEMS TO WANT TO FOLLOW THEIR OATH TO DEFEND IT!
You Might Also Like :
Ted Cruz's Eligibility To Run For The Office Of The Presidency
Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.