Liberals use the philosophy of Pragmatism as an excuse for their actions – Part One

by F J Rocca




Indeed, the term “pragmatic” is used interchangeably with “practical.” However, this is misleading. What works in the near term does not always prove to work in the long term. True Pragmatism does not preach convenient expedients. It says merely that the truth is not something abstract. It is found in reality. The reality is that what works for one person does not always or necessarily work for another person. What is good for most people is not necessarily good for all people. But politicians like to collectivize the concept of “the people.” There are deep and significant reasons why this concept is not merely wrong but fraudulent. Collectives do not exist in human society or in human nature. The concept of collectivism is ant-individual and a deliberate invention of those seeking power.


 In fact, it can and has proven to lead to dictatorships. It is the concept of collectivism that enables politicians to promise to “feed the people,” a promise that is false at its root, because there is no such thing as a collective stomach. Each person has his own individual stomach, each with individual needs. Society consists not of a collective of “the people” but of “many persons.” Groups do exist, but they are not collectives, because groups consist of individual members coming together for a purpose, usually, although not always, by choice. Even prisoners locked up against their will are not cogs in a wheel. They are individuals who have placed themselves there by their individual actions.

No “one size fits all” policy works in a society of individual citizens. One size fits all is a convenient tool for the lies and expedience of politicians who want an easy way to promise what they have no intention of delivering. The concept of “the most good for the most people” is an illusion imposed on them by “authority,” usually the government. It is always a fraud, because what is said to be best for a collective can never be best for each and every individual, not because one person’s best is never another person’s best, but because no single specific best can be tailored to every member of society. That’s why we have individual freedom! Obamacare is a perfect example of collective false promises.


Truth is truth in nature and in reality. Facts are indisputable and, according to James and Pearce, truth will eventually show itself immutably. The problem is in finding out what the truth is. Human thinking is complex and what is true may be hidden beneath many layers of experience and interpretation, making the absolute truth difficult or impossible to find at any given moment. 

Consequently, human beings can be easily fooled by definitions of truth that are intended to distract them from reality, where the truth actually exists. Lies can often be foggy and difficult to discern, thus, they are a convenient weapon for public officials. In fact, each person must determine what the truth is according to the most reliable information available to him at any given moment and upon his best, sincerest effort to find out what it is. This leads to the only reasonable conclusion that human beings need some guidelines which can be applied always and without hesitation in any given situation where a decision of what to do must be made. The best guidelines for civilized human beings are those “universal” truths which lead to goodness embodied in the last five of the Ten Commandments. I say the last five, because not everyone has a monotheistic or even a theistic view of right and wrong, goodness and badness, correct vs. incorrect behavior.


No comments:

Post a Comment